2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jd010782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice formation in Arctic mixed‐phase clouds: Insights from a 3‐D cloud‐resolving model with size‐resolved aerosol and cloud microphysics

Abstract: [1] The single-layer mixed-phase clouds observed during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program's Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (MPACE) are simulated with a three-dimensional cloud-resolving model, the System for Atmospheric Modeling (SAM), coupled with an explicit bin microphysics scheme and a radar simulator. By implementing an aerosol-dependent and a temperature-and supersaturation-dependent ice nucleation scheme and treating IN size distribution prognostically, the link between ice crysta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
126
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
11
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This feedback loop is referred to from here on as "recycling". Recycling was found to be significant in large eddy simulations (LES) of a single-layer stratocumulus observed during the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE; Verlinde et al, 2007;Fan et al, 2009). AMPS observed during M-PACE formed due to a cold-air outbreak, where large fluxes of heat and moisture over the open ocean forced turbulent roll clouds that were coupled to the surface layer.…”
Section: A Solomon Et Al: the Role Of Ice Nuclei Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feedback loop is referred to from here on as "recycling". Recycling was found to be significant in large eddy simulations (LES) of a single-layer stratocumulus observed during the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE; Verlinde et al, 2007;Fan et al, 2009). AMPS observed during M-PACE formed due to a cold-air outbreak, where large fluxes of heat and moisture over the open ocean forced turbulent roll clouds that were coupled to the surface layer.…”
Section: A Solomon Et Al: the Role Of Ice Nuclei Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase-dependent microphysical processes such as collision, coalescence, aggregation, riming and secondary ice formation (e.g., HallettMossop ice multiplication) determine the growth and shape of the ice particles in mixed-phase Arctic clouds (Pruppacher and Klett, 2010). Nucleation, growth, and sedimentation processes of ice crystals are still not comprehensively understood which leads to discrepancies between observed and modeled ice number concentrations (Fan et al, 2009;Morrison et al, 2008;Avramov et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact freezing might eventually explain the discrepancy between the measured number of ice nuclei (IN) and observed number concentration of ice crystals in a cloud (Avramov et al, 2011;Fridlind et al, 2007). Experimental findings suggest that contact freezing efficiency (i.e., the probability of a supercooled droplet freezing on a single contact with the IN) is a function of the temperature of the supercooled droplet and the size of the contacting particle, but the comprehensive characterization of potential contact ice nuclei in the relevant temperature range is still missing (Fan et al, 2009). Currently, no theory exists that would allow for even qualitative prediction of the IN efficiency (in any freezing mode) given the chemical structure and morphology of the IN particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%