2009 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2009.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICDAR 2009 Signature Verification Competition

Abstract: Recent results of forgery detection by implementing biometric signature verification methods are promising. At present, forensic signature verification in daily casework is performed through visual examination by trained forensic handwriting experts, without reliance on computerassisted methods. With this competition on on-and offline skilled forgery detection, our objective is to make a first step towards bridging the gap between automated biometric performances and expert-based visual comparisons. We intent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasaine and Al-Maadeed proposed a skilled forgeries and simulated signatures detector based on differences of on-line signals and their histograms [8]. They report Equal Error Rates (EERs) below 0.1% for the QU on-line signature DB (12 subjects) and for the ICDAR2009 signature verification competition dataset [3] (50 subjects).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasaine and Al-Maadeed proposed a skilled forgeries and simulated signatures detector based on differences of on-line signals and their histograms [8]. They report Equal Error Rates (EERs) below 0.1% for the QU on-line signature DB (12 subjects) and for the ICDAR2009 signature verification competition dataset [3] (50 subjects).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the user can modify his or her signature if it is stolen, 1 whereas it is not possible to change his or her face, fingerprints and so on. 2 Moreover, online signature verification can incorporate dynamic information about the handwritten signature, and therefore, it can often achieve higher performance than using static signatures (Plamondon and Lorette, 1989;Blankers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existem várias bases de dados contendo assinaturas manuscritas na grafia latina [3] [4]. Entretanto, não foram encontradas até o momento bases disponíveis na literatura com exemplares com variabilidade de tamanho.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified