2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718)
DOI: 10.1109/nnsp.2003.1318025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Icasso: software for investigating the reliability of ICA estimates by clustering and visualization

Abstract: Abstract. A major problem in application of independent component analysis (ICA) is that the reliability of the estimated independent components is not known. Firstly, the finite sample size induces statistical errors in the estimation. Secondly, as real data never exactly follows the ICA model, the contrast function used in the estimation may have many local minima which are all equally good, or the practical algorithm may not always perform properly, for example getting stuck in local minima with strongly su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
214
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
214
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7T rsfMRI data were corrected for slice time and spatial realignment, followed by nuisance regression using anatomical component-based noise correction (aCompCor) per Behzadi and associates (2007), scrubbing of outlier volumes detected by the ART repair toolbox (Mazaika et al, 2009), band-pass filtering at 0.1-0.01 Hz, and smoothing with a 6-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel. Independent component analysis (ICA) with 35 target components was subsequently performed using the GIFT toolbox (Correa et al, 2005) utilizing the Infomax algorithm with ICASSO to determine the reliability of ICA results (Himberg and Hyvarinen, 2003). Three experienced raters ( J.J.P., S.A., and H.I.S.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7T rsfMRI data were corrected for slice time and spatial realignment, followed by nuisance regression using anatomical component-based noise correction (aCompCor) per Behzadi and associates (2007), scrubbing of outlier volumes detected by the ART repair toolbox (Mazaika et al, 2009), band-pass filtering at 0.1-0.01 Hz, and smoothing with a 6-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel. Independent component analysis (ICA) with 35 target components was subsequently performed using the GIFT toolbox (Correa et al, 2005) utilizing the Infomax algorithm with ICASSO to determine the reliability of ICA results (Himberg and Hyvarinen, 2003). Three experienced raters ( J.J.P., S.A., and H.I.S.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistency analysis using ICASSO-ICASSO [31] presents a visualization technique that enables analysis of the differences among estimates obtained from multiple runs due to the iterative nature of FastICA. In [32], ICASSO was used to analyze ICA of fMRI data using FastICA.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stability of the components, i.e. investigating whether a component has the tendency to split or merge with another component (Rosazza et al, 2011), was validated by running the ICASSO toolbox implemented in GIFT using twenty iterations with both random iterations and bootstrapping (Himberg and Hyvärinen, 2003;Himberg et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, it is difficult to determine the correct number of components, and to prevent the splitting or merging of components (Fox and Raichle, 2007;Smith et al, 2009). We tried to reduce this risk by estimating the optimal number of components (Li et al, 2006) and running the ICASSO toolbox (Himberg and Hyvärinen, 2003;Himberg et al, 2004), which showed good stability. Moreover, we also ran ICA with more or less components (20, 25, 35 and 40), and this did not change our findings (data not shown), which is in agreement with Rosazza et al (2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%