2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2014.6944466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICA-based reduction of electromyogenic artifacts in EEG data: Comparison with and without EMG data

Abstract: Analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) recorded during movement is often aggravated or even completely hindered by electromyogenic artifacts. This is caused by the overlapping frequencies of brain and myogenic activity and the higher amplitude of the myogenic signals. One commonly employed computational technique to reduce these types of artifacts is Independent Component Analysis (ICA). ICA estimates statistically independent components (ICs) that, when linearly combined, closely match the input (sensor) da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, including electromyography (EMG) recordings may help to improve artifact attenuation (Gabsteiger et al 2014). Yet, in previous studies it was possible to sufficiently attenuate movementrelated artifacts using ICA without additional information from EMG channels (Debener et al 2012, Salvidegoitia et al 2019, Scanlon et al 2020.…”
Section: Auditory Attention Decoding (Aad)-distractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, including electromyography (EMG) recordings may help to improve artifact attenuation (Gabsteiger et al 2014). Yet, in previous studies it was possible to sufficiently attenuate movementrelated artifacts using ICA without additional information from EMG channels (Debener et al 2012, Salvidegoitia et al 2019, Scanlon et al 2020.…”
Section: Auditory Attention Decoding (Aad)-distractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, automated rejection is not necessarily unique to ERASE (Delorme et al, 2001 , 2007 ; Nicolaou and Nasuto, 2007 ; Nolan et al, 2010 ; Mognon et al, 2011 ; Daly et al, 2012 , 2013 ; Wu et al, 2018 ; Vaidya et al, 2019 ), given that other methods, such as cICA can also involve automatic IC rejection when prior knowledge of EMG signals is available (Hesse and James, 2006 ; Akhtar et al, 2012 ; Urigüen and Garcia-Zapirain, 2015 ). Previously reported EMG artifacts removal methods also proposed automated rejection techniques, in which some classifiers were built to classify the ICs into EMG sources and EEG sources based on ICs statistical features (Nolan et al, 2010 ; Gabsteiger et al, 2014 ; Wu et al, 2018 ). However, one unique aspect of ERASE compared to these prior reports is that rejection criteria are based on physiological features of both EEG and EMG for automated EMG artifacts rejection procedure (section 2.1.2), which makes ERASE more focused on preserving relevant EEG phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have some limitations, mainly related to the inability to completely remove noise from the corrupted signal without the introduction of undesired distortions, and the need for a priori noise information for signal filtering. These limitations, associated with several features estimated from the EEG signal to suit the diversity of applications, motivate the search for multiple gold standards for removing EEG artifacts (Safieddine et al, 2012 ; Gabsteiger et al, 2014 ; Urigüen and Garcia-Zapirain, 2015 ; Bono et al, 2016 ; Upadhyay et al, 2016 ; Frølich and Dowding, 2018 ; Mucarquer et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%