1992
DOI: 10.1080/03461238.1992.10413901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IBNR models with random delay distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideas have been developed further by HESSELAGER and WITTING (1988), who specify assumptions about stochastic variation in the development pattern from one year to another. This issue has been pursued also in a recent paper by NEUHAUS (1992). The present paper carries on in two directions of increasing generality.…”
Section: A Objective Of the Study And Relations To Existing Actuariamentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ideas have been developed further by HESSELAGER and WITTING (1988), who specify assumptions about stochastic variation in the development pattern from one year to another. This issue has been pursued also in a recent paper by NEUHAUS (1992). The present paper carries on in two directions of increasing generality.…”
Section: A Objective Of the Study And Relations To Existing Actuariamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…a portfolio of fire insurance policies where the fire peril and the typical claim size vary substantially from one house to another, depending on size of the building, building materials, fire preventing measures, and possibly other characteristics. As explained by NORBERG and SUNDT (1985), in such a situation one cannot rely on aggregate statistics on claims frequencies and claim sizes for the portfolio as a whole: changes in the composition of the portfolio may cause considerable changes of the claims process in the course of time.…”
Section: Observable Risk Characteristics Modelled By Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a portfolio of fire insurance policies where the fire peril and the typical claim size vary substantially from one house to another, depending on size of the building, building materials, fire preventing measures, and possibly other characteristics. As explained by NORBERG and SUNDT (1985), in such a situation one cannot rely on aggregate statistics on claims frequencies and claim sizes for the portfolio as a whole: changes in the composition of the portfolio may cause considerable changes of the claims process in the course of time.…”
Section: Observable Risk Characteristics Modelled By Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years a number of papers on loss reserving have appeared where the delay probabilities for observations in discrete time are assumed to vary between occurrence years. In these papers (HESSELAGER and WITTING, 1988;NEUHAUS, 1992;LAWLESS, 1994; HESS and SCHMIDT, 1994a, b) the variations are treated as random fluctuations between occurrence years and are modelled by a Dirichlet distribution which is a mathematically very convenient construct. In the present paper it is shown that fluctuations induced in the discretizing process possess a special structure and that these fluctuations can not be described by a Dirichlet distribution in a reasonable manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%