Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Gregorio, M.A. de; Guirola, Jose; Sierre, Sergio; Urbano, José; Ciampi-Dopazo, Juan José; Abadal, J. M.; Pulido, Juan D.; Eyheremendy, Eduardo; Lonjedo, Elena; Guerrero, Guadalupe; Serrano‐Casorran, Carolina; Pardo, Pedro; Arrieta, Micaela; Rodríguez-Gómez, José; Bonastre, Cristina; Behrens, George; Lanciego, Carlos; Ferral, Héctor; Magallanes, Mariano; Méndez, S.; Perez, Mercedes; Gonzalez-Nieto, Jimena; Kuo, William T.; Jiménez, David

doi:10.3390/jcm11010077

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The treatment of choice in VTD is systemic anticoagulant therapy that includes: heparin, low-weight heparins, warfarin, acenocoumarin, and the new oral anticoagulants (2). When anticoagulation fails or is contraindicated, most clinical guidelines recommend implanting an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) (3)(4)(5).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness, Retrievability and Safety of Celect vs ALN Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Randomized Controlled Study

Gregorio¹,

Ciampi-Dopazo²,

Urbano³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to compare IVC Celect and ALN filters in regard to their efficacy, retrievability, and 1-year follow-up after retrieval. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study, conducted in three centers between April 2020 and May 2021. A total of 115 participants were randomized, of which 15 participants were excluded for various reasons. Each group of 50 participants was finally assigned a type of filter (Celect n= 50 and ALN= 50). Tilt angles at placement and retrieval together with rates of overall filter retrieval, complications, complex retrieval, and clinical follow-up at 12 months were compared. Results: One hundred participants (59 men and 41 women) were included. The mean age was 62.4±13.3 with no significant differences between both groups (p 0.503). The mean of dwelling time was 44.7±93 days. (p 0.520) Filter retrieval was successful in all participants (100%). The main complication in CT prior to removal was inclination > 15º (31%) and filter tip embedment (16%). No significant differences were observed in the type of retrieval (standard or complex) between both filters (p 0.24); however, fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the complex removal of the Celect filter 29.1±12 min vs 17.5±10.3 (p 0.005). After one year, no recurrent pulmonary embolism was observed in both types of filters. Conclusion: The ALN filter had a significantly lower rate of tip and filter tip embedding with no differences in complexity or removal success rate. There were significant differences in the fluoroscopy time consumed for standard and complex retrievals between both filters with less time in the ALN filter

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness, Retrievability and Safety of Celect vs ALN Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Randomized Controlled Study

Gregorio¹,

Ciampi-Dopazo²,

Urbano³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Outcomes of different zero-profile spacers in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative disk disease

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations, Retrieval Rates, and Filter Complications in a Tertiary Hospital

Gabara,

Montoya-Rodes,

López

et al. 2023

Angiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study evaluated the adherence to guideline recommendations regarding the indication for inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement, retrieval rates, complications, thrombotic recurrences, and mortality. Patients in whom an IVCF was placed between 2015 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. We considered absolute indication of IVCF placement if all the guidelines evaluated agreed on the indication, relative indication if only some guidelines recommended it and without indication if none of the evaluated guidelines recommended it. From the 185 patients included; 47% had an absolute indication, 15% a relative indication, and 38% had no indication. Filter-associated complications and non-removal rates were 12.4% and 41%, respectively. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rate was 17.8%, being filter-associated complications (24.2 vs 9.8%, P = .02) and thrombosis of the inferior cava or iliac veins (12.1 vs 2.6%, P = .03) more frequent in this group. The mortality rate was 40%, with higher mortality risk in patients with co-existing cancer. Previous major bleeding, filter-associated complications, and mortality were associated with a major risk of non-removal. In conclusion, the adherence to guidelines regarding the indication of IVCF placement is still low and IVCF complications are not negligible. This fact is of special concern in the elderly, comorbid, and cancer patients.

show abstract

Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Cited by 4 publications

References 72 publications

Effectiveness, Retrievability and Safety of Celect vs ALN Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Randomized Controlled Study

Effectiveness, Retrievability and Safety of Celect vs ALN Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Randomized Controlled Study

Outcomes of different zero-profile spacers in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative disk disease

Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations, Retrieval Rates, and Filter Complications in a Tertiary Hospital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About