2013
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31828f2a5a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iatrogenically Induced Foreign Body of the Maxillary Sinus and its Surgical Management

Abstract: The maxillary sinus is in close proximity of the maxillary dentition; due to the close interaction between these two, there is a possibility of any disease process affecting one that can spread or concomitantly affect the other. This proximity may lead to foreign bodies to displace into the maxillary sinus and lead to development of infection. The signs and symptoms of affecting one structure can superimpose on the other; this can lead to diagnostic dilemmas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical course and indications for removal of the periorbital foreign body depend on a variety of factors, such as its position (near vital structures), chemical structure (many metals and plastic materials may be inert, whereas wood is associated with a higher incidence of complications), potentially infectious nature, or clinical findings (displacement or damage to vital anatomical structures and ophthalmological evaluation findings) [ 4 , 8 ]. In some periorbital trauma the foreign body is dislocated in the maxillary sinus; many authors suggested its removal to prevent future infections [ 9 , 10 ]. However, infection is not a certain outcome since sinuses have been observed to be healthy despite the inclusion of foreign materials [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical course and indications for removal of the periorbital foreign body depend on a variety of factors, such as its position (near vital structures), chemical structure (many metals and plastic materials may be inert, whereas wood is associated with a higher incidence of complications), potentially infectious nature, or clinical findings (displacement or damage to vital anatomical structures and ophthalmological evaluation findings) [ 4 , 8 ]. In some periorbital trauma the foreign body is dislocated in the maxillary sinus; many authors suggested its removal to prevent future infections [ 9 , 10 ]. However, infection is not a certain outcome since sinuses have been observed to be healthy despite the inclusion of foreign materials [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these publications are Level 4 and therefore have a low level of scientific evidence (Tab. I) [1,2,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Corpus Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral bacterial flora is introduced into the sinuses, which is in principle, a germless cavity, via the antral floor perforation during avulsion. The presence of a foreign body irritates the sinus mucosa or blocks the ostium, sometimes causing an inflammatory reaction over time [20]. The latter leads to a partial or total interruption of mucociliary clearance and reduces the permeability of the ostium.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These can be of varying natures such as dental implants, fractured teeth roots, endodontic materials and tools 10,11 , dental burs 12 , dental impression materials 13 , dental fillings materials (e.g. amalgam) 14,15 . Less frequent are the foreign bodies of non-dental origin, which are related to facial injuries such as those from car accidents or assaults.…”
Section: Incidence and Etiopathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%