2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-007-0203-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IAEA quality control study on determining trace elements in biological matrices for air pollution research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our evaluation, the cause has to do with the different Hg levels in the two SRMs. In the first SRM, Hg is at 12.3 µg g −1 , whereas the authors find 13.0 µg g −1 with a coefficient of variation (CV%, defined as the ratio between standard deviation and mean value × 100) of 6.1, a good value according to the references [49,54,55]. In the second SRM, the certified Hg value is 0.0432 µg g −1 (or 43.2 ng g −1 ), whereas the authors find 0.0223 µg g −1 with a CV% of 45.7, which is an unsatisfactory value according to the ref [54].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to our evaluation, the cause has to do with the different Hg levels in the two SRMs. In the first SRM, Hg is at 12.3 µg g −1 , whereas the authors find 13.0 µg g −1 with a coefficient of variation (CV%, defined as the ratio between standard deviation and mean value × 100) of 6.1, a good value according to the references [49,54,55]. In the second SRM, the certified Hg value is 0.0432 µg g −1 (or 43.2 ng g −1 ), whereas the authors find 0.0223 µg g −1 with a CV% of 45.7, which is an unsatisfactory value according to the ref [54].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Primary (1 mg mL −1 of each one) and standard reference materials (SRMs; five geochemical SRMs such as USGS GRX-1, GRX-3, GRX-4, GRX-5, GRX-6) [ 42 , 43 ] were used to assess the quality control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows the comparison between our data and the relative certified values for the investigated SRMs. As reported in previous papers [38,39], the authors refer to the precision, calculated as the coefficient of variation (CV%), for defining a mean value as good, acceptable, or unsatisfactory (i.e., <20%, between 20-30% and >30%, respectively, for concentration levels <500 µg g −1 ; <10%, between 10-20% and >20%, respectively, for concentration levels >500 µg g −1 ). Furthermore, the table shows the accuracy, calculated as the difference between found and certified values and reported as ∆, and the z-scores, which represent the distance between the raw score and the population mean in units of the standard deviation and also includes the relative uncertainties of each certified value and the measurement performed (a positive z-score means a value above the mean, a negative z-score is a value below the mean).…”
Section: Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (Inaa) Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%