Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1086/421841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XMM‐NewtonObservation of Solar Wind Charge Exchange Emission

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
298
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
298
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We checked the observation for contamination by solar wind charge exchange. The ACE SWEPAM 1 proton flux was less than 4 × 10 8 protons s −1 cm −2 which is typical of the quiescent Sun (e.g., Snowden et al 2004;Fujimoto et al 2007;Yoshino et al 2009), and the light curve accumulated in a 0.5−2 keV energy band (after soft proton flares removal) did not show any variability. The spectra of the out-of-field-of-view events of CCD 4 and 5 of MOS1 and CCD 5 of MOS 2 showed an anomalously high flux in the soft band (see ) so they were therefore excluded from our analysis.…”
Section: Observation and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We checked the observation for contamination by solar wind charge exchange. The ACE SWEPAM 1 proton flux was less than 4 × 10 8 protons s −1 cm −2 which is typical of the quiescent Sun (e.g., Snowden et al 2004;Fujimoto et al 2007;Yoshino et al 2009), and the light curve accumulated in a 0.5−2 keV energy band (after soft proton flares removal) did not show any variability. The spectra of the out-of-field-of-view events of CCD 4 and 5 of MOS1 and CCD 5 of MOS 2 showed an anomalously high flux in the soft band (see ) so they were therefore excluded from our analysis.…”
Section: Observation and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our treatment of the different background components builds directly on the work by De Luca & Molendi (2004), Snowden et al (2004Snowden et al ( , 2008; see also Snowden & Kuntz (2012).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snowden et al (2004) used a method to subtract the EPIC-MOS instrumental background by scaling closed filter observations, as created by the XMM-Newton science operations centre (SOC). Other authors Read & Ponman 2003;De Luca & Molendi 2004;Nevalainen et al 2005) developed and used comparable methods.…”
Section: Epic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%