The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.02126
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I Will Have Order! Optimizing Orders for Fair Reviewer Assignment

Abstract: Scientific advancement requires effective peer review. Papers should be reviewed by experts in the subject area, but it is equally important that reviewer quality is fairly distributed amongst papers. We model reviewer assignment as an instance of a fair allocation problem, presenting an extension of the classic round-robin mechanism, called Reviewer Round Robin (RRR). Round-robin mechanisms are a standard tool to ensure envy-free up to one item (EF1) allocations. However, fairness often comes at the cost of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors in [5] provide a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for finding MUW within EF1 for any fixed number of agents for goods, which is exponential in the number of agents. In the paper, [41], the authors present an approximately optimal round-robin order that gives highly efficient (USW) EF1 allocations in the Reviewer Assignment setting; however, the setting is quite different from ours, as we are not concerned with the multiplicity of items.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Authors in [5] provide a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for finding MUW within EF1 for any fixed number of agents for goods, which is exponential in the number of agents. In the paper, [41], the authors present an approximately optimal round-robin order that gives highly efficient (USW) EF1 allocations in the Reviewer Assignment setting; however, the setting is quite different from ours, as we are not concerned with the multiplicity of items.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it can be faster than FairIR and PeerReview4All. Payan and Zick (2021) formulated the RAP as a kind of fair allocation problem for the fair distribution of the reviewer's quality to the proposals. In this study, envy is the main criterion emphasized for fairness, which means if one proposal prefers reviewers assigned to another proposal more than its own, it will envy the other.…”
Section: ∑ 𝑥 𝑖𝑗 𝑛 𝑖=1mentioning
confidence: 99%