“…Black feminist anthropologists working in Brazil, such as Luciane de Oliveira Rocha (2020), Keisha-Khan Perry (2020), Christen A. Smith (2016; see also Smith, Davies, and Gomes 2021), Kia L. Caldwell (see Caldwell et al 2018), Nessette Falu (2019, and Erica L. Williams (2013), provide a model for how U.S.-based scholars can use their citational praxis to make room for Black feminist researchers and practitioners in other countries. 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though space is limited here, I want to acknowledge how citational practices that mostly draw from U.S.‐based scholars and English‐speaking sources constitute one way Black women researchers and organizers are frequently made invisible. Black feminist anthropologists working in Brazil, such as Luciane de Oliveira Rocha (2020), Keisha‐Khan Perry (2020), Christen A. Smith (2016; see also Smith, Davies, and Gomes 2021), Kia L. Caldwell (see Caldwell et al 2018), Nessette Falu (2019), and Erica L. Williams (2013), provide a model for how U.S.‐based scholars can use their citational praxis to make room for Black feminist researchers and practitioners in other countries.…”
What does a Black feminist citational practice look and feel like? This contribution to the #CiteBlackWomen colloquy focuses on two arguments: First, that Black feminist citational praxis is one of the major interventions Black women scholars contribute to the academy; and second, that anthropology’s neglect and erasure of Black feminist anthropologists relates to disciplinary (un)belonging. I explore how citation and “disciplinary belonging” influence hiring practices, doctoral training, intellectual genealogies, and what is valued as anthropological knowledge.
“…Black feminist anthropologists working in Brazil, such as Luciane de Oliveira Rocha (2020), Keisha-Khan Perry (2020), Christen A. Smith (2016; see also Smith, Davies, and Gomes 2021), Kia L. Caldwell (see Caldwell et al 2018), Nessette Falu (2019, and Erica L. Williams (2013), provide a model for how U.S.-based scholars can use their citational praxis to make room for Black feminist researchers and practitioners in other countries. 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though space is limited here, I want to acknowledge how citational practices that mostly draw from U.S.‐based scholars and English‐speaking sources constitute one way Black women researchers and organizers are frequently made invisible. Black feminist anthropologists working in Brazil, such as Luciane de Oliveira Rocha (2020), Keisha‐Khan Perry (2020), Christen A. Smith (2016; see also Smith, Davies, and Gomes 2021), Kia L. Caldwell (see Caldwell et al 2018), Nessette Falu (2019), and Erica L. Williams (2013), provide a model for how U.S.‐based scholars can use their citational praxis to make room for Black feminist researchers and practitioners in other countries.…”
What does a Black feminist citational practice look and feel like? This contribution to the #CiteBlackWomen colloquy focuses on two arguments: First, that Black feminist citational praxis is one of the major interventions Black women scholars contribute to the academy; and second, that anthropology’s neglect and erasure of Black feminist anthropologists relates to disciplinary (un)belonging. I explore how citation and “disciplinary belonging” influence hiring practices, doctoral training, intellectual genealogies, and what is valued as anthropological knowledge.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.