2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.444_5_5.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visceral culture: blushing and the legibility of whiteness in eighteenth‐century British portraiture

Abstract: This essay engages art history and visual culture more fully with the visceral spaces of gendered and racialized subjectivities, by focusing on an involuntary bodily performance, the blush. Towards the end of the eighteenth century British artists in particular represented their female sitters with pale, white skin and strikingly flushed cheeks. What did the blush as a corporeal eruption mean in a culture where the circulation and mixing of blood was a cause of great anxiety? The essay suggests that far from b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experience of white privilege allows for whites to interact with images that represent their race and life experience on a frequent basis (McIntosh ). The unacknowledged norm of whiteness becomes a standard by which all other forms of art are judged (Rosenthal ). Several curators reflected on interactions with visitors that made this outgroup status clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experience of white privilege allows for whites to interact with images that represent their race and life experience on a frequent basis (McIntosh ). The unacknowledged norm of whiteness becomes a standard by which all other forms of art are judged (Rosenthal ). Several curators reflected on interactions with visitors that made this outgroup status clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these paintings women's skin is depicted as particularly pale, sensitive and transparent, an emphasis on whiteness that, as Rosenthal further argues, has to be understood within the emerging framework of racial discourses in the eighteenth century. 20 A similar development can be observed in French art theory where the term 'skin colour' for what has been painted with 'flesh tones' emerged only in the second half of the eighteenth century, and thus simultaneously with racial anthropology; both discourses became 'colour conscious', as signalled by the superiority accorded white skin as the universal ideal and standard of beauty. In French medical and moral-anthropological discourse, a privileging of the white and sensitive female skin is equally evident.…”
Section: T H E O R I E S a N D H I S T O R I E S O F S K I Nmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Fend discusses how the whiteness of the women in Ingres' portraits is ‘obviously a sign of racial and social distinction’, while demonstrating that the discourses of French art theory and racial anthropology became ‘colour conscious’ simultaneously, ‘as signalled by the superiority accorded white skin as the universal ideal and standard of beauty’ 57. Rosenthal goes further to argue that ‘white(ness) as a visually racial category emerged as an explicit value in the eighteenth century … [and] whiteness became preeminently visual through a particular physiological capability perceived as a feminine “virtue”: fair women's capacity to blush’ 58. Though ‘The White Disease’ is not portraying in any definite way a blushing woman, there are similarities with the descriptions of Rosenthal and Fend in the way Dumas uses colour to emphasise whiteness—the face in the portrait is flushed pink across the nose, cheeks and forehead, the eyes are bright blue, and the background is dark and solid compared with the more transparent tones in the face.…”
Section: Using Titles To Classifymentioning
confidence: 99%