2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01188.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘I’ve put weight on cos I’ve bin inactive, cos I’ve ’ad me knee done’: moral work in the obesity clinic

Abstract: As governments and healthcare systems grow increasingly concerned with the current obesity 'epidemic', sociological interest in the condition has also increased. Despite the emergence of work discussing obesity as a social phenomenon, the sociological dimensions of medical weight-loss treatments for obesity remain underexplored. This paper reports on a conversation analytic (CA) study and describes how moral issues surrounding weight and patienthood become visible when doctors and patients discuss obesity. Con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But it also derived from students' appraisals of obese patients as blameworthy. Using the exquisite, fine-grain methodology of conversation analysis, Helena Webb has revealed the pervasive nature of moral judgment in an obesity clinic [51]. What was remarkable, moreover, was how the patients themselves described their weight loss progress in moral terms of good and bad and how actively they shaped the conversation to reflect their agency or their lack of blame.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it also derived from students' appraisals of obese patients as blameworthy. Using the exquisite, fine-grain methodology of conversation analysis, Helena Webb has revealed the pervasive nature of moral judgment in an obesity clinic [51]. What was remarkable, moreover, was how the patients themselves described their weight loss progress in moral terms of good and bad and how actively they shaped the conversation to reflect their agency or their lack of blame.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misalignment between the smoker's reasons for smoking or wanting to quit and the adviser's perceptions of what these were would result in the adviser setting inappropriate goals for the smoker. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] These misalignments may therefore explain why a smoker's sharing of their lifeworld was not always associated with quit success. This interpretation of the data is supported by similar findings in our separate analysis of adviser interviews, with some advisers explicitly stating that they emphasised particular strategies in those smokers they considered would find it harder to quit, to try to help them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiggins suggested that whilst patients are drawing upon an individualist concept of weight which reifies the medical model and renders them responsible, their resistance is couched in a way that troubles this model through claims that it does not work even when they adhere to the diet plan. Similarly, a conversation analytic study conducted by Webb (2009) found that patients at an obesity clinic emphasized their own agency by documenting their exercise and improved health when achieving success but minimized their agency with mitigating factors, such as difficulty in exercising or reactions to drugs, when they gained weight.…”
Section: Morality and Social Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, drawing upon conversation analysis the analysis is grounded sequentially -people display their understanding of the previous 'turn' of talk (what has just been said) in their subsequent turn (their response and uptake of what was said). Examining such practices in situ allows us to explore the business of talk in settings such as commercial weight management groups (Mycroft, 2008), NHS weight management treatment (Wiggins, 2009), and obesity clinics (Webb, 2009) discussed below.…”
Section: Discursive Psychology: Naturalistic Data and The Influence Omentioning
confidence: 99%