2015
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1011711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(un)Doing the Next Generation Science Standards: climate change education actor-networks in Oklahoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning about climate change is cognitively challenging due to the abstract and highly interconnected earth systems involved. But what makes this topic even more confounding is the purposeful efforts of some to disparage and deny the scientific consensus, including parents and school community members (Colston & Ivey, 2015). Additionally, the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) reports on the deliberate efforts of anti-science and climate denial campaigns to artificially create a perception of controversy and doubt surrounding the scientific evidence supporting anthropogenic climate change (NCSE, 2012).…”
Section: Climate Change As a Pressing Environmental And Educational Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Learning about climate change is cognitively challenging due to the abstract and highly interconnected earth systems involved. But what makes this topic even more confounding is the purposeful efforts of some to disparage and deny the scientific consensus, including parents and school community members (Colston & Ivey, 2015). Additionally, the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) reports on the deliberate efforts of anti-science and climate denial campaigns to artificially create a perception of controversy and doubt surrounding the scientific evidence supporting anthropogenic climate change (NCSE, 2012).…”
Section: Climate Change As a Pressing Environmental And Educational Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) reports on the deliberate efforts of anti-science and climate denial campaigns to artificially create a perception of controversy and doubt surrounding the scientific evidence supporting anthropogenic climate change (NCSE, 2012). The presence of such antiscience campaigns positions the science classroom as a battleground and raises important questions about how to approach this topic in the midst of the controversy (Colston & Ivey, 2015). The widespread influence of the anti-science climate denial efforts can be plainly seen in the opinions and pedagogical practices of some science educators (Meehan, 2012;Plutzer et al, 2016) to teach 'both sides' of the issue.…”
Section: Climate Change As a Pressing Environmental And Educational Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evolution) in science classrooms [Colston and Vadjunec, 2015;National Center for Science Education, 2012]. In other cases, there has been political resistance to the state-level adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), which unequivocally link human activities to climate change [Colston and Ivey, 2015]. Teachers across the nation, who are engaged in climate change education, reported increasing experiences with pushback about teaching climate change from school administrators, parents, and students [Johnson, 2011].…”
Section: Climate Change Denial In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the importance of the topic, the U.S. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), designed for public K-12 education, incorporated climate change within its disciplinary core ideas in Earth and Space Science (Earth and Human Activity, ESS3; Earth Systems, ESS2) and Life Sciences (Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics, LS2; Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity, LS4) (NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, some science educators perceive barriers to implementing a climate change curriculum within public schools, similar to issues encountered with the theory of evolution within U.S. science classrooms (Colston and Ivey, 2015).…”
Section: Geoscience Education: Climate Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%