2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UBVRIPHOTOMETRIC STANDARD STARS AROUND THE CELESTIAL EQUATOR: UPDATES AND ADDITIONS

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
259
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
259
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10.1 and (d) the MegaCam passband model detailed in Appendix B. The filter model at the exact focal plane location of the science target may be obtained by interpolating between the filter scans detailed in Tables 14 to 18. Very recently, Landolt (2009) published an extension of the catalog used in this paper. Bluer as well as fainter stars were added to the Landolt (1992b) catalog.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10.1 and (d) the MegaCam passband model detailed in Appendix B. The filter model at the exact focal plane location of the science target may be obtained by interpolating between the filter scans detailed in Tables 14 to 18. Very recently, Landolt (2009) published an extension of the catalog used in this paper. Bluer as well as fainter stars were added to the Landolt (1992b) catalog.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias and the flat-field corrections were applied to each of the eight CCD images independently, while the combination of the different exposures, the astrometry, the reconstruction of the final image and the construction of the weight images were done with the modules MissFITS, SCAMP, and SWarp of TERAPIX (Bertin et al 2002). The photometric calibration was performed using the observation of the Landolt calibration stars S107a, S107b, S104, and S98 (Landolt 2009), giving an extinction coefficient of 0.095 ± 0.043 mag and a zero point of 25.57 ± 0.02 mag. The extraction of the stellar positions and magnitudes was done using SExtractor with the weight images produced by the SWarp module.…”
Section: R Band Ctio Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper sky subtraction was performed measuring the sky statistics in regions of blank sky near, but not adjacent, to the object to avoid the contaminating effects of the coma background. To perform the absolute flux calibration of our science frames, we took images of photometric standard stars in Landolt fields (Landolt 2009) at airmasses similar to the comet observations, and we applied the methodology described in Palmer & Davenhall (2001). The comet images were therefore calibrated using the JohnsonKron-Cousins photometric system used by Landolt (2009).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the absolute flux calibration of our science frames, we took images of photometric standard stars in Landolt fields (Landolt 2009) at airmasses similar to the comet observations, and we applied the methodology described in Palmer & Davenhall (2001). The comet images were therefore calibrated using the JohnsonKron-Cousins photometric system used by Landolt (2009). The extinction correction was performed assuming the standard atmospheric conditions for La Palma 4 and Tenerife 5 .…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%