2017
DOI: 10.1101/gr.202150.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trans-splicing enhances translational efficiency in C. elegans

Abstract: Translational efficiency is subject to extensive regulation. However, the factors influencing such regulation are poorly understood. In , 62% of genes arespliced to a specific spliced leader (SL1), which replaces part of the native 5' untranslated region (5' UTR). Given the pivotal role the 5' UTR plays in the regulation of translational efficiency, we hypothesized that SL1 splicing functions to regulate translational efficiency. With genome-wide analysis on Ribo-seq data, polysome profiling experiments, and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(116 reference statements)
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SL sequences in nematodes bear trimethylguanosine caps (m 2,2,7 G; Liou and Blumenthal 1990), in contrast to native 5' UTRs, which contain a monomethylguanosine (m 7 G) cap (Sonenberg, 2000). Under well fed conditions, we found that trans-spliced mRNA was translated better than mRNA with the native 5' UTR, supporting previous analysis (Yang et al, 2017). While this pattern was maintained under DR, it was modestly but significantly attenuated for SL1 spliced genes ( Figure 3B).…”
Section: Rbps and Translation Regulation Under Drsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SL sequences in nematodes bear trimethylguanosine caps (m 2,2,7 G; Liou and Blumenthal 1990), in contrast to native 5' UTRs, which contain a monomethylguanosine (m 7 G) cap (Sonenberg, 2000). Under well fed conditions, we found that trans-spliced mRNA was translated better than mRNA with the native 5' UTR, supporting previous analysis (Yang et al, 2017). While this pattern was maintained under DR, it was modestly but significantly attenuated for SL1 spliced genes ( Figure 3B).…”
Section: Rbps and Translation Regulation Under Drsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Using annotations of SL1 and SL2 spliced genes from Allen et al (2011), we calculated the average fold change in translational regulation of genes with trans-spliced or native 5' UTRs. Under AL, our analysis confirmed that both SL1 and SL2 trans-spliced messages tend to be better translated than transcripts with native 5' UTRs ( Figure 3B), as previously reported (Yang et al, 2017). DR led to translational suppression of SL1 spliced genes compared to AL conditions (p=1.4e-7, Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction).…”
Section: Trans-spliced Genes Are Refractory To Diminished Translationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, operon resolution is not the sole function of SLTS in C. elegans , as only 17% of C. elegans transcripts originate from operons 15,18 . It has been hypothesized that SLTS is involved in many translational regulation mechanisms, including the replacement of deleterious sequences in the 5′-untranslated region, addition of translational motifs from within the SL sequence, or by replacing a transcript’s 5′-monomethylated cap with a 5′-hypermodified cap structure 1824 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first to be discovered, SL1, is acquired by mRNAs through a trans-splicing reaction that removes the 5' UTR, also known as the 'outron', of capped pre-mRNAs derived from monocistronic genes and the first genes in operons. SL1 trans-splicing serves to sanitise the 5' ends of mRNAs, and thus impacts their translational efficiency (Yang et al 2017). The other spliced leader type, SL2, is added to mRNAs encoded by downstream operonic genes, which are otherwise uncapped and thus cannot be translated without SL2 trans-splicing (Spieth et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%