2020
DOI: 10.1002/spe.2874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The Canary in the Coal Mine…” A cautionary tale from the decline of SourceForge

Abstract: Summary Forges are online collaborative platforms to support the development of distributed open source software. While once mighty keepers of open source vitality, software forges are rapidly becoming less and less relevant. For example, of the top 10 forges in 2011, only one survives today—SourceForge—the biggest of them all, but its numbers are dropping and its community is tenuous at best. Through mixed‐methods research, this article chronicles and analyze the software practice and experiences of the proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a number of researchers have attempted to identify relations between sociotechnical aspects and properties of source code like defect-proneness, [53][54][55][56] change-proneness, [57][58][59] continuous integration build failures, 60,61 and long-term sustainability of software communities. [62][63][64] A complementary view on software health concerns with the analysis of open-source projects and their characteristics. In this respect, a vast body of knowledge has been reported and synthetized through systematic literature reviews.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a number of researchers have attempted to identify relations between sociotechnical aspects and properties of source code like defect-proneness, [53][54][55][56] change-proneness, [57][58][59] continuous integration build failures, 60,61 and long-term sustainability of software communities. [62][63][64] A complementary view on software health concerns with the analysis of open-source projects and their characteristics. In this respect, a vast body of knowledge has been reported and synthetized through systematic literature reviews.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%