<i>The Bolshevik Seizure of Power</i>, by S. P. Melgunov, edited by S. G. Pushkarev

Hanson, Gary

doi:10.3138/cjh.9.1.106

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Currently five major loci resistant to TYLCV ( Ty-1 , Ty-2 , Ty-3 , Ty-4 and Ty-5 ) have been introgressed from different wild tomato relatives into tomatoes. Among these, Ty-1 [ 7 ], Ty-3 [ 8 ] and Ty-4 [ 9 ] derived from different S. chilense accessions, Ty-2 [ 10 ] originated from S. habrochaites , and Ty-5 [ 11 ] was identified in S. peruvianum . Recently, Ty-1 and Ty-3 were found to be allelic and had been cloned [ 12 , 13 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of a Resistant vs. Susceptible Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Cultivar in Response to Infection by Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) threatens tomato production worldwide by causing leaf yellowing, leaf curling, plant stunting and flower abscission. The current understanding of the host plant defense response to this virus is very limited. Using whole transcriptome sequencing, we analyzed the differential gene expression in response to TYLCV infection in the TYLCV-resistant tomato breeding line CLN2777A (R) and TYLCV-susceptible tomato breeding line TMXA48-4-0 (S). The mixed inoculated samples from 3, 5 and 7 day post inoculation (dpi) were compared to non-inoculated samples at 0 dpi. Of the total of 34831 mapped transcripts, 209 and 809 genes were differentially expressed in the R and S tomato line, respectively. The proportion of up-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the R tomato line (58.37%) was higher than that in the S line (9.17%). Gene ontology (GO) analyses revealed that similar GO terms existed in both DEGs of R and S lines; however, some sets of defense related genes and their expression levels were not similar between the two tomato lines. Genes encoding for WRKY transcriptional factors, R genes, protein kinases and receptor (-like) kinases which were identified as down-regulated DEGs in the S line were up-regulated or not differentially expressed in the R line. The up-regulated DEGs in the R tomato line revealed the defense response of tomato to TYLCV infection was characterized by the induction and regulation of a series of genes involved in cell wall reorganization, transcriptional regulation, defense response, ubiquitination, metabolite synthesis and so on. The present study provides insights into various reactions underlining the successful establishment of resistance to TYLCV in the R tomato line, and helps in the identification of important defense-related genes in tomato for TYLCV disease management.

show abstract