2017
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TFG‐MET fusion in an infantile spindle cell sarcoma with neural features

Abstract: An increasing number of congenital and infantile sarcomas displaying a primitive, monomorphic spindle cell phenotype have been characterized to harbor recurrent gene fusions, including infantile fibrosarcoma and congenital spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma. Here we report an unusual spindle cell sarcoma presenting as a large and infiltrative pelvic soft tissue mass in a 4-month-old girl, which revealed a novel TFG-MET gene fusion by whole transcriptome RNA sequencing. The tumor resembled the morphology of an infan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical outcome is less predictable, with some cases showing aggressive clinical behavior, including distant metastases. The alternate fusions may involve genes such as BRAF , NTRK1 , 10‐12 and MET 13 ; a minority of IFS‐like tumors demonstrate compound intragenic BRAF deletions associated with tandem dupplication of exon 2, which may occur with or without the cannonical ETV6‐NTRK3 fusion 12 . Their mechanism of activation is most likely similar to the BRAF ‐related fusions, resulting in loss of the N‐terminal of BRAF protein containing the negative regulatory Ras‐binding domain (BRD), with subsequent constitutive activation of BRAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical outcome is less predictable, with some cases showing aggressive clinical behavior, including distant metastases. The alternate fusions may involve genes such as BRAF , NTRK1 , 10‐12 and MET 13 ; a minority of IFS‐like tumors demonstrate compound intragenic BRAF deletions associated with tandem dupplication of exon 2, which may occur with or without the cannonical ETV6‐NTRK3 fusion 12 . Their mechanism of activation is most likely similar to the BRAF ‐related fusions, resulting in loss of the N‐terminal of BRAF protein containing the negative regulatory Ras‐binding domain (BRD), with subsequent constitutive activation of BRAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, novel gene fusions are described with increasing frequency, particularly within the subset of fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumours. Overlapping gene fusion events with rearrangements involving ALK , BRAF , NTRK1 , NTRK2 , NTRK3 , MET and others have recently been described as recurrent findings in these tumours 1–8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of soft tissue neoplasms is significantly refined by the increasing use of powerful genomic tools such as RNA‐sequencing in routine clinical practice. Among the most significant advances in this area belongs the emerging group of monomorphic spindle cell tumors showing ambiguous line of differentiation, defined by a largely uncharacteristic spindle cell morphology along with the presence of gene fusions that cause oncogenic activation of various kinases such as NTRK1/2/3 , RAF , BRAF , ALK , PDGFRβ , ROS1 , MET , and others . Notably, a significant minority of patients within the aggressive subset of these tumors may benefit from treatment with selective kinase inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%