2017
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terra incognita of soil biodiversity: unseen invasions under our feet

Abstract: Whilst cartographers of the 19th century endeavoured to chart the last unknown lands, the great challenge for biologists in the 21st century is to fill the gaps on the biodiversity map of the Earth. And one of the largest gaps concerns the biodiversity of soils, a terra incognita right under our feet. The study of soil biodiversity, and particularly the complex communities of small invertebrates, has suffered from a severe ‘taxonomic impediment’ (Decaëns ) leading to great uncertainties about total species ric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale and dynamics of community assembly contrasts with patterns and processes reported for the microbial eukaryote diversity of the soil (Bahram et al, 2016) and aligns with recent empirical evidences suggesting that at the local scale dispersal rates may be much lower for soil mesofauna than for microfauna (Zinger et al, 2019). In the context of the overall arthropod diversity (for which soil mesofauna comprises the majority of the smallest fraction), our results are not supporting the macroecological prediction for a reduce impact of dispersal limitation in the assemblage for small-bodied components compared with their bigger counterparts (de Bie et al, 2012; Ricklefs, 2004) and highlight the uniqueness of ecological and evolutionary processes driving the biodiversity of these edaphic arthropods (Andújar, Arribas, & Vogler, 2017; Andújar, Pérez-González, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…This scale and dynamics of community assembly contrasts with patterns and processes reported for the microbial eukaryote diversity of the soil (Bahram et al, 2016) and aligns with recent empirical evidences suggesting that at the local scale dispersal rates may be much lower for soil mesofauna than for microfauna (Zinger et al, 2019). In the context of the overall arthropod diversity (for which soil mesofauna comprises the majority of the smallest fraction), our results are not supporting the macroecological prediction for a reduce impact of dispersal limitation in the assemblage for small-bodied components compared with their bigger counterparts (de Bie et al, 2012; Ricklefs, 2004) and highlight the uniqueness of ecological and evolutionary processes driving the biodiversity of these edaphic arthropods (Andújar, Arribas, & Vogler, 2017; Andújar, Pérez-González, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…While above‐ground species of beetle and spider were sampled almost exclusively from single islands, the below‐ground mesofauna revealed extensive sharing across islands and with continents. As Andujar, Arribas, and Vogler () note in an accompanying perspective, the results from the Cicconardi et al. () study are consistent with “massive introductions of … species in remote oceanic islands,” a clear hallmark of the Anthropocene.…”
Section: From the Cover Papers And Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…(Scholes, 2018). Genome sequencing is increasingly relevant for monitoring and managing these communities, from detecting underground invasions (Andújar et al, 2017) to chemical-free pest control. For example, genome information is essential to identify targets for RNA interference, an emerging species-specific alternative to chemicals (Vogel et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ul and L Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%