2004
DOI: 10.1179/037178404225004968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine

Abstract: Equipment selection is one of the most important factorsin open pit design and production planning. Equipment selection also affects economic considerations in open-pit design as a function of plan location and depth. Furthermore, equipment selection is a complex multiperson, multi-criteria decision problem. The group decision-making process can be improved by a systematic and logical approach to assess priorities based on the inputs of several specialists from different functional areas within the mine compan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These complexities create an environment which makes it difficult to analyze simultaneously all relevant factors. Different methodologies have been used to select surface mining equipment including but not limited to expert systems (Bandopadhyay and Venkatasubramanian, 1987;Denby and Schofield, 1990;Amirkhanian and Baker, 1992;Ganguli and Bandopadhyay, 2002), mathematical modeling (Fishler, 1987;Çelebi, 1998), computerized modeling (Chan and Harris, 1989;Haidar, 1999;Alkass et al 2003), simulations (Sturgul, 2000), queuing theory (Alkass et al 2003), and multi attribute decision making (Samanta, 2002;Bascetin, 2003;Bascetin, 2004;Kazakidis, 2004;Kulak, 2005;Shapita and Goldenberg, 2005;Bascetin et al 2006;Tayeb 2007;Aghajani and Osanloo, 2007;Aghajani et al 2009;Aghajani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complexities create an environment which makes it difficult to analyze simultaneously all relevant factors. Different methodologies have been used to select surface mining equipment including but not limited to expert systems (Bandopadhyay and Venkatasubramanian, 1987;Denby and Schofield, 1990;Amirkhanian and Baker, 1992;Ganguli and Bandopadhyay, 2002), mathematical modeling (Fishler, 1987;Çelebi, 1998), computerized modeling (Chan and Harris, 1989;Haidar, 1999;Alkass et al 2003), simulations (Sturgul, 2000), queuing theory (Alkass et al 2003), and multi attribute decision making (Samanta, 2002;Bascetin, 2003;Bascetin, 2004;Kazakidis, 2004;Kulak, 2005;Shapita and Goldenberg, 2005;Bascetin et al 2006;Tayeb 2007;Aghajani and Osanloo, 2007;Aghajani et al 2009;Aghajani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined as "a multi-objective and multi-criteria decision-making approach that uses pairwise comparison to arrive at a scale of preference among a set of alternatives" [88] (p. 286). The applications of this methodology have been very varied and belong to very diverse fields of study [89][90][91][92][93][94]. In the scope of geography, the most relevant studies are related fundamentally with territorial planning [95][96][97].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a loading-hauling system using an AHP-based model was evaluated by Bascetin (2004) for coal production in an open pit coal mine located Orhaneli, in western Turkey. Yaman (2001) proposed a knowledge-based approach for selection of material handling equipment and material handling system pre-design.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%