1973
DOI: 10.1063/1.3127954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
438
1
11

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(471 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
438
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case the reactions (79,83) offer an interesting alternative, since they can proceed via the photon or Z 0 couplings to bileptons, which always remain sizable.…”
Section: High Energy Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case the reactions (79,83) offer an interesting alternative, since they can proceed via the photon or Z 0 couplings to bileptons, which always remain sizable.…”
Section: High Energy Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic resolution [83] with which a reaction can set bounds on a given parameter, say the lepton-bilepton coupling λ, is given by the Cramér-Rao limit If the systematic errors are small, this limit is closely approached by a maximum likelihood estimator. Indeed, defining the probability density…”
Section: B the Cramér-rao Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this, comparisons between empirical distributions and statistical models suggest that this number of samples is also large enough. With respect to the goodness of fits, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Benjamin and Cornell, 1970;Eadie et al, 1971) is not restrictive enough to decide about the acceptance or rejection of a statistical model when the number of samples is relatively low. An alternative is given then by the L-skewness-kurtosis diagrams (Hosking and Wallis, 1997), based on the L-moment formulation, which can be easily implemented for theoretical distributions fitting < S >, S M and CS.…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ǫ j = σ n ′ j . Due to the constraint (4) we applied rms errors of ∆ ′ j , assuming a multinomial distribution of the number of cascades [14]. Actually the multinomial distribution is valid not for the sum of cascades, identified as those induced by nuclei j, but separately for each constituent nucleus i identified as j, and therefore the error depends on the primary mass composition.…”
Section: Determination Of the Primary Mass Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%