1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.3023520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

States of Matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5, the relative magnetic susceptibility change is plotted versus the maximum signal intensity drop in each experiment. The magnetic susceptibility change induced by a paramagnetic agent depends on the square of the magnetic moment (8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the relative magnetic susceptibility change is plotted versus the maximum signal intensity drop in each experiment. The magnetic susceptibility change induced by a paramagnetic agent depends on the square of the magnetic moment (8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will assume that α = β for this calculation. 8 Given this assumption, the true heat capacity is C = (δH + α)τ 1 /∆T .…”
Section: Maintaining the Balance Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since we calculate properties over a much longer number of MCS than is required for structural relaxation, we continue to call the calculated energy fluctuation term the specific heat and denote it as C v for convenience. At the phase transition, C v shows a peak as fluctuations in energy 39 become large. The U p value at which we observe a peak in C v on cooling from the melt state is termed the crystallization U p , in tune with experimental ͑calorimetry͒ convention, even though crystallization takes place over a range of U p .…”
Section: Model and Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%