2016
DOI: 10.3366/cor.2016.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Say and stancetaking in courtroom talk: a corpus-assisted study

Abstract: Approached as an interactional phenomenon, stance is realised through varied linguistic devices and practices which need not be overtly evaluative. Say, the basic communication verb which indicates the source of knowledge and, thus, perspectivises the information imparted by speakers, is one such resource. Its stancetaking potential is exploited, among other settings, in the courtroom or in the police interview room, where institutional authority is exerted and the facts of legal stories are ‘fixed’ and formul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the degree of involvement in the relations of university life activity acts as an objective basis, a kind of foundation of a particular type of lifestyle. Not being the only fundamental basis, the degree of inclusion is at the same time the most important of them [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the degree of involvement in the relations of university life activity acts as an objective basis, a kind of foundation of a particular type of lifestyle. Not being the only fundamental basis, the degree of inclusion is at the same time the most important of them [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most corpus-based studies vary in the degree to which corpus analysis is accompanied or augmented by other types of investigation. It is relatively seldom that research into evaluative language is carried out based on corpus analysis alone [45] For example, Szczyrbak [100] focuses on phrases with 'say' as indicative of the alignment function of stance-taking. The paper identifies the frequency of each phrase in the corpus of libel proceedings before a UK court.…”
Section: Corpus-based Studies Of Evaluation In Judicial Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, qualitative work in courtroom discourse has been augmented by the quantitative analysis made possible by corpus techniques, as in the examination of important high-frequency individual words and their usage across single trials or a number of trials (e.g. Tkačuková 2015;Szczyrbak 2016). In addition, corpora have been built and analysed which comprise some of the more underexplored aspects of trial discourse, such as closing arguments or summing up (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%