2019
DOI: 10.1101/626119
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing

Abstract: 1 9

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that plants (65% of genomes) and especially the phyllosphere compartment (41% of genomes) were the most prevalent source of Methylobacterium . From these genomes, we built a phylogenetic tree based on the complete nucleotide sequence of rpoB , a highly polymorphic marker that experienced no copy number variation in many bacteria taxa (44, 45), and that we confirmed to be single copy in Methylobacterium and related genera Microvirga and Enterovirga ( Figure 1, Supplementary dataset 1a ). In this phylogeny, we roughly identified main Methylobacterium groups (A, B, and C) previously defined based on the 16S gene (30) and found that phyllosphere-associated diversity was not randomly distributed in the Methylobacterium phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that plants (65% of genomes) and especially the phyllosphere compartment (41% of genomes) were the most prevalent source of Methylobacterium . From these genomes, we built a phylogenetic tree based on the complete nucleotide sequence of rpoB , a highly polymorphic marker that experienced no copy number variation in many bacteria taxa (44, 45), and that we confirmed to be single copy in Methylobacterium and related genera Microvirga and Enterovirga ( Figure 1, Supplementary dataset 1a ). In this phylogeny, we roughly identified main Methylobacterium groups (A, B, and C) previously defined based on the 16S gene (30) and found that phyllosphere-associated diversity was not randomly distributed in the Methylobacterium phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess Methylobacterium diversity at a finer evolutionary level, we thus developed a molecular marker targeting all members of the Methylobacteriaceae family, using the core gene rpoB ( Figure 1 (44, 45)). Based upon rpoB sequences available for Methylobacterium ( Supplementary dataset 1a) , as well as sequencing of rpoB partial sequences from 20 Methylobacterium isolates from a pilot survey in MSH in 2017 ( Figure 2d; Table S1; Supplementary dataset 1f,g ) we determined that this gene is polymorphic enough to explore diversity within the aforementioned Methylobacterium clades (See supplementary method ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marker is reported to be suitable for phylogenetic analyses as it provides a better resolution at the species level (Ogier et al . 2019). The phylogenetic tree included 29 representative Aeromonas sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have demonstrated that direct linking of near-16S genomic sequences to those of the V1-V2 16S rRNA region gives a number of significant methodological advancements to microbiome characterization. Although alternative approaches to interrogate microbiomes have been suggested [50,51], the amount of 16S rRNA sequences in the databases greatly exceeds those of other bacterial genes and whole genomes, favouring the use of 16S rRNA as a phylogenetic marker. Considerable effort has been devoted to improving its taxonomic resolution [13,14], but because of limited diversity of within-gene sequences and hardly predictable gene copy numbers [52] unequivocal characterization of microbiomes was barely possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%