“…Several authors have subsequently contributed to improve knowledge of species diversity (Farghaly, 1980;Meinesz, 1980;Littler & Littler, 1990a, 1990bVroom et al, 1998;Collado-Vides et al, 2009), and with the discovery of new species and the increase in morphological information, several authors have discussed the need to redefine genera (Agardh, 1887;Gepp & Gepp, 1911;Nizamuddin, 1963;Farghaly, 1980;Littler & Littler, 1990a;Dragastan et al, 1997). The few molecular-based studies conducted on Udoteaceae have highlighted conflicts between morphological and molecular information, revealing polyphyletic genera (i.e., Chlorodesmis, Penicillus, Poropsis, Rhipocephalus, Rhipidosipon, and Udotea) and unresolved phylogenetic relationships for most taxa (Kooistra, 2002;Lam & Zechman, 2006;Curtis et al, 2008;Verbruggen et al, 2009aVerbruggen et al, , 2009cCoppejans et al, 2011;Lagourgue et al, 2018;Wade & Sherwood, 2017;Cremen et al, 2019). When reassessing the classification of the order Bryopsidales using the chloroplast genome, and to avoid proliferation of new families with a parsimonious and practical purpose, Cremen et al (2019) proposed to abandon the Udoteaceae family in favor of tribe Udoteae, which the authors placed in family Halimedaceae Link, together with other families such as Rhipiliaceae Kützing and Pseudocodiaceae L. Hillis-Colinvaux, and the genus Halimeda.…”