2020
DOI: 10.1002/pi.6035
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retracted: Influence of organic montmorillonite nanoparticles on the microstructures and thermal and tribological properties of polyethersulfone and polytetrafluoroethylene composites

Abstract: Because of high wear rate and low thermal deformation temperature, the generalization and application of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in the field of tribology is restrained to a certain extent. In order to improve the wear resistance and thermal stability of this self‐lubricating polymer, organic montmorillonite (OMMT) nanoparticle reinforced polyethersulfone (PES) and PTFE ternary composites were prepared by the cold molding and vacuum sintering technology. The effects of sodium montmorillonite (Na‐MMT) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm the intercalation structure and interlayer spacing after intercalation, Bragg’s equation (2 d sin θ = nλ , where d is the interplanar spacing; θ is the angle between the incident X-ray and the corresponding crystal face; λ is the wavelength of the X-ray (λ = 1.5418 Å); n is the order of diffraction, n = 1) was used to calculate the layer spacing for MMT nanoparticles before and after QAS intercalation, which is denoted as the d -value. Compared with Na-MMT, the diffraction peak corresponding to the 001 crystal face of the modified MMT was obviously shifted to the left, which proved the successful intercalation of QAS . The d001-value of Na-MMT was 1.207 nm, which implied an atypical Na + form within the interlayer spacing of MMT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm the intercalation structure and interlayer spacing after intercalation, Bragg’s equation (2 d sin θ = nλ , where d is the interplanar spacing; θ is the angle between the incident X-ray and the corresponding crystal face; λ is the wavelength of the X-ray (λ = 1.5418 Å); n is the order of diffraction, n = 1) was used to calculate the layer spacing for MMT nanoparticles before and after QAS intercalation, which is denoted as the d -value. Compared with Na-MMT, the diffraction peak corresponding to the 001 crystal face of the modified MMT was obviously shifted to the left, which proved the successful intercalation of QAS . The d001-value of Na-MMT was 1.207 nm, which implied an atypical Na + form within the interlayer spacing of MMT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Compared with Na-MMT, the diffraction peak corresponding to the 001 crystal face of the modified MMT was obviously shifted to the left, which proved the successful intercalation of QAS. 20 The d001-value of Na-MMT was 1.207 nm, which implied an atypical Na + form within the interlayer spacing of MMT. Due to the larger ionic radius of the quaternary ammonium cations, the layer spacings of Im16-MMT and Py16-MMT was extended to 1.339 and 1.356 nm, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 97%