1976
DOI: 10.1126/science.194.4262.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response : Fluorescent Nectar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that bumblebees could not detect nectar levels in inflorescences that had not been visited, and so readily accepted inflorescences that had been depleted of nectar artificially. Thus they are unlikely to be using either direct vision of nectar, detection of humidity gradients or nectar scent to discriminate between inflorescences (Thorp et al 1975(Thorp et al , 1976Kevan 1976;Corbet et al 1979). The flower structure of S. officinale would in any case render these explanations unlikely since the nectaries are entirely enclosed within the corolla, and bees can gain access only by forcing apart the anther bases that form a barrier across the inside of the tubular corolla (although robbing holes provides a limited direct view of nectaries).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that bumblebees could not detect nectar levels in inflorescences that had not been visited, and so readily accepted inflorescences that had been depleted of nectar artificially. Thus they are unlikely to be using either direct vision of nectar, detection of humidity gradients or nectar scent to discriminate between inflorescences (Thorp et al 1975(Thorp et al , 1976Kevan 1976;Corbet et al 1979). The flower structure of S. officinale would in any case render these explanations unlikely since the nectaries are entirely enclosed within the corolla, and bees can gain access only by forcing apart the anther bases that form a barrier across the inside of the tubular corolla (although robbing holes provides a limited direct view of nectaries).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms may be in operation. Bees can assess pollen content of open flowers visually (Zimmerman 1982), and may be able to determine the nectar content of some flower species in the same way (Thorp et al 1975(Thorp et al , 1976Kevan 1976). They may also be able to assess nectar volumes from the scent of the nectar itself or of fermentation products from yeasts in the nectar (Crane 1975;Heinrich 1979;Williams et al 1981), or from humidity gradients surrounding the flower (Corbet et al 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little is known about their reproductive and taxonomic importance (Dafni, 1984 [3] ; van der Pijl, 1960 [30] , Vogel, 1998 [33] ). Thorp et al (1975 [27] , 1976 [28] ) and Kevan (1976 [12] , 1978 [13] ) discussed whether or not the nectar fluoresces or only reflects the light to become more visible to flower visitors. In any case, nectar should be highly visible as glistening droplets and act as a visual attractant, both in visible and ultraviolet wavelengths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it appears that bumblebees use some means of remote sensing for their decision on what flower to probe. Possible mechanisms include direct detection of the nectar by visual (Kevan, 1976;Thorp et al, 1975Thorp et al, , 1976 or olfactory (Raguso, 2004) cues. However, many bumblebee-visited plant species have flowers in which nectar is concealed at the base of deep corolla tubes, which makes direct assessment of nectar volume problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%