2005
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.25.24.11184-11190.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rasgrf1 Imprinting Is Regulated by a CTCF-Dependent Methylation-Sensitive Enhancer Blocker

Abstract: Imprinted methylation of the paternal Rasgrf1 allele in mice occurs at a differentially methylated domain (DMD) 30 kbp 5 of the promoter. A repeated sequence 3 of the DMD regulates imprinted methylation, which is required for imprinted expression. Here we identify the mechanism by which methylation controls imprinting. The DMD is an enhancer blocker that binds CTCF in a methylation-sensitive manner. CTCF bound to the unmethylated maternal allele silences expression. CTCF binding to the paternal allele is preve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because CTCF is known to participate in the molecular mechanisms driving allele-specific expression from the Igf2/H19 locus and other imprinted loci (Hikichi et al, 2003;Singh et al, 2012;Yoon et al, 2005), we asked whether the increase in p57 and kcnq1 expression observed after CTCF depletion resulted from a loss of imprinting. Taking advantage of responsive fibroblasts carrying single nucleotide polymorphisms in the p57/ kcnq1 locus, we have already demonstrated that the MyoDdependent induction of p57 involves upregulation of the normally active maternal allele and not the de-repression of the normally silent paternal allele (Busanello et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ctcf Is Required For P57 Repression In Undifferentiated and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because CTCF is known to participate in the molecular mechanisms driving allele-specific expression from the Igf2/H19 locus and other imprinted loci (Hikichi et al, 2003;Singh et al, 2012;Yoon et al, 2005), we asked whether the increase in p57 and kcnq1 expression observed after CTCF depletion resulted from a loss of imprinting. Taking advantage of responsive fibroblasts carrying single nucleotide polymorphisms in the p57/ kcnq1 locus, we have already demonstrated that the MyoDdependent induction of p57 involves upregulation of the normally active maternal allele and not the de-repression of the normally silent paternal allele (Busanello et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ctcf Is Required For P57 Repression In Undifferentiated and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTCF-binding sites have been identified at other imprinted genes such as Rasgrf1 and Kcnq1ot1 (Yoon et al 2005;Fitzpatrick et al 2007), but given the large number of CTCF-binding sites in the genome and the diverse proposed functions for CTCF (Barski et al 2007;Kim et al 2007;Xie et al 2007;Filippova 2008), it is unclear whether the presence of CTCF infers insulator function. There is evidence for insulator activity at the Rasgrf1 locus (Yoon et al 2005), but further experiments are required at this and other loci to determine whether they use an H19/Igf2-type model of imprinting regulation. Most importantly, additional cis-regulatory sequences, such as enhancers, must be identified to assess the suitability of an insulator model at these loci.…”
Section: Insulator Model Of Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTCF has long been associated with genomic imprinting due to its selective binding of the unmethylated maternal allele of the Igf2/H19 ICR resulting in parent-of-origin-specific expression of Igf2 and H19 in mouse and human (Bell and Felsenfeld 2000;Hark et al 2000;Kanduri et al 2000;Fedoriw et al 2004;Szabo et al 2004). CTCF has been studied at several other imprinted loci, and it binds the unmethylated allele at the gDMRs of Rasgrf1, Peg13, Kcnq1ot1 (Yoon et al 2005;Fitzpatrick et al 2007;Singh et al 2011), and Grb10 (Hikichi et al 2003;Mukhopadhyay et al 2004). CTCF-mediated regulation is postulated to be one of two major control mechanisms operating at ICRs (Lewis and Reik 2006;Kim et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%