1995
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.15.4.2245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAD1 and RAD10, but Not Other Excision Repair Genes, Are Required for Double-Strand Break-Induced Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: HO endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be repaired by the process of gap repair or, alternatively, by single-strand annealing if the site of the break is flanked by directly repeated homologous sequences. We have shown previously (J. Fishman-Lobell and J. E. Haber, Science 258:480-484, 1992) that during the repair of an HO-induced DSB, the excision repair gene RAD1 is needed to remove regions of nonhomology from the DSB ends. In this report, we present evi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
159
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
9
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The counterpart of ERCC1-XPF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rad10-Rad1, is required not only for NER but also for recombination between direct repeated DNA sequences, a process which is also called single strand annealing (13,14). By analogy, ERCC1-XPF is expected to fulfil a similar role in mammalian cells, and the two homologous protein complexes have been proposed to remove 3Ј protruding single-stranded arms from recombined duplex regions (13,15).…”
Section: Nucleotide Excision Repair (Ner)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The counterpart of ERCC1-XPF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rad10-Rad1, is required not only for NER but also for recombination between direct repeated DNA sequences, a process which is also called single strand annealing (13,14). By analogy, ERCC1-XPF is expected to fulfil a similar role in mammalian cells, and the two homologous protein complexes have been proposed to remove 3Ј protruding single-stranded arms from recombined duplex regions (13,15).…”
Section: Nucleotide Excision Repair (Ner)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incisions made by ERCC1-XPF and XPG during NER co-localize to the borders of the opened DNA intermediate (8) and protein-protein interactions with other NER factors are likely to determine the exact positioning of both nucleases. For ERCC1-XPF, interactions with XPA and RPA have been reported (9 -12).The counterpart of ERCC1-XPF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rad10-Rad1, is required not only for NER but also for recombination between direct repeated DNA sequences, a process which is also called single strand annealing (13,14). By analogy, ERCC1-XPF is expected to fulfil a similar role in mammalian cells, and the two homologous protein complexes have been proposed to remove 3Ј protruding single-stranded arms from recombined duplex regions (13,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These residual crossovers may reflect the activity of a yet-unidentified JM resolvase; they may also reflect the production of half-crossovers by breakinduced replication (Ho et al, 2010;Kogoma, 1996;Llorente et al, 2008) or by other mechanisms that do not involve dHJ-JM formation and resolution (Ivanov and Haber, 1995;Mazó n et al, 2012;Muñoz-Galván et al, 2012). Alternatively, long-tract NCO gene conversion events that include flanking heterologous sequences might be responsible for the products, scored in our molecular assays as COs, that are independent of both MutLg and SSNs.…”
Section: The Interplay Of Resolvase Activities Is Chromosome Context-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crossovers were significantly elevated in mei-9; Blm mutants relative to Blm single mutants, but were not elevated in mus201; Blm mutants ( Figure 1C). Rad1 has NER-independent DNA repair functions (Klein 1988;Fishman-Lobell and Haber 1992;Ivanov and Haber 1995); the crossover elevation caused by removing MEI-9 might be a consequence of disrupting pathways other than NER. We also tested the effect of removing the NER damage recognition protein XPC, which is encoded by the mus210 gene (Sekelsky et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%