<i>Queen Victoria: A Life of Contradictions.</i> By Matthew Dennison. (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2013. Pp. xiv, 184. $22.95.)

Arnstein, Walter L.

doi:10.1111/hisn.12212

The Historian

2016

DOI: 10.1111/hisn.12212

|View full text |Cite

Queen Victoria: A Life of Contradictions. By Matthew Dennison. (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2013. Pp. xiv, 184. $22.95.)

Walter L. Arnstein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To appreciate why Lewin, a German Jew, became a social activist, we need to understand that he left Germany for America in 1933 as the position of Jews grew increasingly untenable (Marrow, 1969). Lewin admired much about America but was appalled by the general acceptance of racism and anti-Semitism, even in academia, and the growth of Nazism (Allport, 1948; Bernstein, 2013; Geary, 2003; G. W. Lewin, 1948a; Marrow, 1969; Sokal, 1984).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Origins of Lewin’s Three-Step Model of Change

Burnes

2019

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the time of his death in 1947, Kurt Lewin was seen as one of the foremost psychologists of his day. He is now best known for his three-step model of change. However, this has been criticized for its “simplicity,” and it has even been suggested that Lewin “never developed such a model,” yet this ignores its links to the rest of Lewin’s work. Surprisingly, there appears to have been no rigorous attempt to understand the connection between Lewin’s early work on field theory and his later work on social and organizational change. In addressing this gap in the Lewin literature, this article will not only show that the three-step model of change is far from being simplistic but also that it was a well-thought-out approach to change based on his development of field theory. The main difference between the two is one of nomenclature rather than substance.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Origins of Lewin’s Three-Step Model of Change

Burnes

2019

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Queen Victoria: A Life of Contradictions. By Matthew Dennison. (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2013. Pp. xiv, 184. $22.95.)

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Origins of Lewin’s Three-Step Model of Change

The Origins of Lewin’s Three-Step Model of Change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About