2018
DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1456317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are major phyla of filterable bacteria passing through 0.22 μm pore size membrane filter, in Lake Sanaru, Hamamatsu, Japan

Abstract: 141 filterable bacteria that passed through a 0.22 μm pore size filter were isolated from Lake Sanaru in Hamamatsu, Japan. These belonged to Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, or Actinobacteria among which the first two phyla comprised the majority of the isolates. 48 isolates (12 taxa) are candidates assignable to new bacterial species or genera of Proteobacteria or Bacteroidetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 16S rRNA gene-containing fragment of approximately 1.5 kb was amplified with the 27F ( ) and 1492R ( ) primers using 2 μl DNA as the template, and the PCR products were sequenced [ 20 ]. PCR was done with a total volume of 50 μl, which contained 27.8 μl Sterilized H 2 O, 5 μl 10×PCR Buffer, 5 μl dNTP Mix, 4μl MgCl 2 , 3 μl Primer1, 3 μl Primer2, 0.2 μl Taq DNA Polymerase and 2 μl Template DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16S rRNA gene-containing fragment of approximately 1.5 kb was amplified with the 27F ( ) and 1492R ( ) primers using 2 μl DNA as the template, and the PCR products were sequenced [ 20 ]. PCR was done with a total volume of 50 μl, which contained 27.8 μl Sterilized H 2 O, 5 μl 10×PCR Buffer, 5 μl dNTP Mix, 4μl MgCl 2 , 3 μl Primer1, 3 μl Primer2, 0.2 μl Taq DNA Polymerase and 2 μl Template DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the abundance and community structure of bacteria, water samples are typically filtered using 0.2-0.45-µm pore-size filters, because most bacterial cells are trapped on filters with pores of this size; however, microbes in 0.2-µm filtrate have been reported from aquatic environments (e.g., MacDonell & Hood 1982, Hahn et al 2003, Miteva & Brenchley 2005, Maejima et al 2018). As 0.2-µm-filterable microbes, two types of ultrasmall cells have been reported (Torrella & Morita 1981, Duda et al 2012: ones that have a larger cell size when incubated with adequate nutrients (Torrella & Morita 1981, Hahn 2004, and others that are ultrasmall cells (obligate ultramicrobacteria) even when incubated with nutrient-rich media (Torrella & Morita 1981, Schut et al 1997, Rappé et al 2002, Hahn et al 2003, Nakai et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the false-negative taxa (51 genera; 2% of the reads) absent from the collection filter could be microbial groups that passed through the 0.22 μm pore-sized filter. As previously reported by Maejima et al (2018), isolated bacteria from lake water samples belonging to the Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria passed through a 0.22 μm pore size filter. The filtered fractions from < 0.2 μm filtered samples that were usually considered "sterile" were found to still contain miniature cells, ultramicrobacteria (i.e., bacteria whose cell size are smaller than 0.1 μm 3 ) and slender filamentous bacteria (e.g., Oligoflexia, Proteobacteria) overlooking a broad diversity of filterable agents (Wang et al, 2007;Nakai 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%