1938
DOI: 10.1086/255243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preface to Social Economics: Essays on Economic Theory and Social Problems. John Maurice Clark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Rutherford (2000, p. 280), Clark (1915) and Clark (1916) are both "pursuing [Clark's] views on social value." Homan (1938) underlines the importance of these two articles as well. Rutherford's assessment accords with that of Homan (1938) in which he points out that Clark "defined for himself the scope of the subject matter of economic inquiry and his 'attitude' toward the complex of social relations within which lie the restricted paths of economic analysis" (p. 430).…”
Section: Joint or Collective Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Rutherford (2000, p. 280), Clark (1915) and Clark (1916) are both "pursuing [Clark's] views on social value." Homan (1938) underlines the importance of these two articles as well. Rutherford's assessment accords with that of Homan (1938) in which he points out that Clark "defined for himself the scope of the subject matter of economic inquiry and his 'attitude' toward the complex of social relations within which lie the restricted paths of economic analysis" (p. 430).…”
Section: Joint or Collective Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Homan (1938) underlines the importance of these two articles as well. Rutherford's assessment accords with that of Homan (1938) in which he points out that Clark "defined for himself the scope of the subject matter of economic inquiry and his 'attitude' toward the complex of social relations within which lie the restricted paths of economic analysis" (p. 430). Exchange values reflect individual utilities or "value in society," but not the value or cost of a marketed entity (conceptualised as commodity, service, property rights bundle, resource, etc.)…”
Section: Joint or Collective Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 87%