2014
DOI: 10.1144/sp392.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pn -velocity structure beneath Arabia–Eurasia Zagros collision and Makran subduction zones

Abstract: We use Pn-tomography to map lithospheric mantle velocity and anisotropy at the Arabia–Eurasia plate boundary, namely Makran and Zagros. We use catalogue events recorded by Oman, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Iran networks, the International Seismological Centre and the National Earthquake Information Center. Events of 1.8–16 degree distances were used for this Pn-tomography. In this study we show that the northeastern Arabia plate is characterized by cold and stable lithospheric mantle. Contrastingly, Eurasia is under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent Pn‐tomography by Al‐Lazki et al . () suggested that the Arabian foreland is underlain by a cold and stable lithosphere, whereas the Eurasian plate has a hot and unstable lithosphere. Based on the calculation of vertical integral of the lithospheric strength by Motavalli‐Anbaran et al .…”
Section: Application To Real Data From Zagros Mountains (Iran)supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent Pn‐tomography by Al‐Lazki et al . () suggested that the Arabian foreland is underlain by a cold and stable lithosphere, whereas the Eurasian plate has a hot and unstable lithosphere. Based on the calculation of vertical integral of the lithospheric strength by Motavalli‐Anbaran et al .…”
Section: Application To Real Data From Zagros Mountains (Iran)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…; Hafkenscheid, Wortel and Spakman ; Al‐Lazki et al . ). The Zagros is composed of three almost parallel tectonic settings in NW‐SE direction, namely Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt (ZFTB), Sanandaj‐Sirjan Zone (SSZ), and Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Assemblage (UDMA) (Alavi ; Berberian ; and references therein), of which ZFTB is located on the Arabian part of the collision zone and the rest are on the Eurasian part.…”
Section: Application To Real Data From Zagros Mountains (Iran)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a transition between different deformation regimes may give rise to deviation of the lithospheric splittings from the observable belt‐parallel trend and even cause the domination of plate motion‐parallel fast axis orientations originating from the asthenospheric flow filed in eastern Zagros. The variation of lithospheric anisotropy along the Zagros inferred from Pn anisotropy (Al‐Lazki et al, ; Lü et al, , ) provides an important clue to the predicted non‐belt‐parallel lithospheric anisotropy in the eastern Zagros.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of widespread volcanism across the Turkish‐Iranian Plateau suggests, however, that there may be significant lateral variation in the density of the mantle beneath the region, and evidence from seismic receiver functions and surface wave tomography also indicate that the elevation of the plateau is partly supported by relatively low‐density lithospheric mantle [ Al‐Lazki et al , , , ; Alinaghi et al , ; Amini et al , ; Innocenti et al , ; Kaviani et al , ; Maggi and Priestley , ; Mutlu and Karabulut , ; engör et al , ; Zor et al , ]. We therefore also estimate differences in GPE from differences in geoid height Δ N ΔN=2πGg0L+hzΔρ(z)dz=2πGg2ΔΓ …”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, seismic wave speeds in the upper mantle are lower beneath the plateaux of central and northwestern Iran than beneath surrounding regions, suggesting that these regions are underlain by hot, weak uppermost mantle and may therefore be intrinsically weaker than their surroundings. Wave speeds below the Zagros Mountains are higher, suggesting that this region may have stronger upper mantle [e.g., Al‐Lazki et al , , , ; Alinaghi et al , ; Amini et al , ; Kaviani et al , ; Maggi and Priestley , ; Mutlu and Karabulut , ; Priestley et al , ].…”
Section: Estimation Of Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%