2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planckearly results. XI. Calibration of the local galaxy cluster Sunyaev-Zeldovich scaling relations

Abstract: We present precise Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect measurements in the direction of 62 nearby galaxy clusters (z < 0.5) detected at high signal-tonoise in the first Planck all-sky data set. The sample spans approximately a decade in total mass, 2 × 10 14 M < M 500 < 2 × 10 15 M , where M 500 is the mass corresponding to a total density contrast of 500. Combining these high quality Planck measurements with deep XMM-Newton X-ray data, we investigate the relations between D 2 A Y 500 , the integrated Compton parame… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the τ − y relation and its scatter reflect the difference in 1/(T e,∆ ) at fixed total gas pressure. This low-scatter correlation in the τ − y relation is not surprising given that the Planck satellite [62] and the Weighing the Giants collaboration [45] found tight correlations between Y and M gas . Previous X-ray measurements of clusters also showed a strong, low-scatter correlation between T X and M gas [e.g., 42,52,88].…”
Section: τ Relationsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, the τ − y relation and its scatter reflect the difference in 1/(T e,∆ ) at fixed total gas pressure. This low-scatter correlation in the τ − y relation is not surprising given that the Planck satellite [62] and the Weighing the Giants collaboration [45] found tight correlations between Y and M gas . Previous X-ray measurements of clusters also showed a strong, low-scatter correlation between T X and M gas [e.g., 42,52,88].…”
Section: τ Relationsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…where ∆lnM is the cluster mass calibration offset relative to S 8,V 09 . We consider two mass calibration offset values, P11 = −0.12 ± 0.02 adopted by Planck team [77] and R12 = 0.11 ± 0.04 corresponding to the cluster mass scale employed in ref. [78].…”
Section: Jcap02(2014)012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 presents the joint two-dimensional marginalized probability distributions in Ω m h 2 − N eff , Ω m h 2 − z eq , and Y P − ξ ν planes for the extensions of mΛCDM models involving leptonic asymmetry. When we transform N eff axis of the left [77] and R12 [78] (indicated by bands). Bottom: S 8 -H 0 joint confidence regions (at 68% and 95% CL) obtained from the same analysis.…”
Section: Degenerate Massive Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities Y X and Y S ZE were determined within the R 500 . The thermal pressure (P) of the intra-cluster medium for each galaxy cluster used in our analyses was modeled by Ade et al [55] via the universal pressure profile discussed by Arnaud et al [56]. This universal profile was obtained by comparing simulated data with observational data (a representative sample of nearby clusters covering the mass range 10 14 M < M 500 < 10 15 M ).…”
Section: A Datamentioning
confidence: 99%