<i>Phomopsis longicolla</i>– new pathogen on <i>Abutilon theophrasti</i> in Croatia

Vrandečić, Karolina; Ćosić, Jasenka; Riccioni, L.; Duvnjak, Tomislav; Jurković, Draženka

doi:10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.00992.x

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, Fernández and Hanlin (1996) noted that one isolate (PI 526), morphologically identified as D. lonigicolla produced few fertile perithecia only when grown on autoclaved elm bark, but they were also not able to repeat that finding. Known hosts -Abutilon theophrasti (Li, Bradley, Hartman & Pedersen, 2001;Vrandečić et al 2004), Acer truncatum (Sun, Guo & Hyde, 2011), Amaranthus spinosus and Leonorus sibiricus (Cerkauskas, Dhingra, Sinclair & Asmus, 1983), Ambrosia trifida, Euphorbia maculata, Rumex crispus, Xanthium strumarium and Vigna unguiculata (Roy, Ratnayake & McLean, 1997), Arachis hypogaea (Sanogo & Etarock, 2009), Aster exilis, Caperonia palustris, Desmanthus illinoensis, Eclipta prostrata, Euphorbia nutans, Ipomoea lacunose, Polygonum aviculare and Sida spinosa (Mengistu & Reddy, 2005), Chamaesyce nutans (Mengistu, Castlebury, Smith, Rossman & Reddy, 2007), Cucumis melo, Glycine max (Hobbs et al 1985;Vidić, Jasnić & Stojšin, 1996;Zhang et al 1997;Santos et al 2011;Gomes et al 2013), Helianthus annuus (Mathew et al 2012), Pyrus pyrifolia (Bai et al 2015), Solanum melongena (Shu et al 2014), and Trichilia elegans (Flores, Pamphile, Sarragiotto & Clemente, 2013). Distribution -Argentina (Hernandez, Pioli, Peruzzo, Formento & Pratta, 2015), Australia (Ash et al 2010), China (Cui, Duan, Wang, Li & Zhu, 2009;Shu, Chen, Huang, He & Zhou, 2014), Croatia (Vrandečić et al 2004), Greece (Holevas et al 2000), New Mexico (Sanogo & Etarock, 2009), Serbia (Vidić & Jasnić, 1994) and USA (Hobbs et al 1985;Zhang et al 1997 Cultural characteristics: Fresh strains were identical with D. longicolla in terms of white, compact aerial mycelia on PDA.…”

Section: Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diaporthe pseudolongicolla: The new pathogen on soybean seed in Serbia

Petrović¹,

Riccioni²,

Đorđević³

et al. 2018

Ratar i povrt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Seed decay is one of the most important diseases of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) that has a negative impact on the market grade of soybeans. The disease is mainly caused by Diaporthe longicolla, along with other Diaporthe species. Screening of soybean seeds health status in Vojvodina Province, Serbia, showed cultural and morphological variability among isolates identified as D. longicolla. With the use of DNA sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) region and partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-α), the new species was determined. BLAST analysis showed 100% identity with D. pseudolongicolla (syn. D. novem) that was described in this study and its taxonomic revision is discussed. Pathogenicity trial showed that both species, D. longicolla and D. pseudolongicolla, are highly pathogenic on soybean stem and seed, causing 100% of stem wilting and more than 82% of seed decay.

show abstract

Section: Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diaporthe pseudolongicolla: The new pathogen on soybean seed in Serbia

Petrović¹,

Riccioni²,

Đorđević³

et al. 2018

Ratar i povrt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…References: Vrandecic et al 2004Vrandecic et al , 2007Mengistu et al 2007;Sanogo and Etarock 2009;Farr and Rossman 2011 Phomopsis longiparaphysata Uecker & K.C. Kuo, Mycotaxon 44: 426 (1992) Disease and host: Associated with disease on fruits of grapevines (Vitis cv.…”

Section: Names Of Common Phytopathogens In Current Usementioning

confidence: 99%

The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The genus Phomopsis (teleomorph Diaporthe) comprises phytopathologically important microfungi with diverse host associations and a worldwide distribution. Species concepts in Phomopsis have been based historically on morphology, cultural characteristics and host affiliation. This paper serves to provide an overview of the current status of the taxonomy in Phomopsis with special reference to biology, applications of various species, species concepts, future research perspectives and names of common pathogens, the latter being given taxonomic reappraisal. Accurate species identification is critical to understanding disease epidemiology and in developing effective control measures for plant diseases. Difficulties in accurate species identification using morphology have led to the application of alternative approaches to differentiate species, including virulence and pathogenicity, biochemistry, metabolites, physiology, antagonism, molecular phylogenetics and mating experiments. Redefinition of Phomopsis/Diaporthe species has been ongoing, and some species have been redefined based on a combination of molecular, morphological, cultural, phytopathological and mating type data. Rapid progress in molecular identification has in particular revolutionized taxonomic studies, providing persuasive genetic evidence to define the species boundaries. A backbone ITS based phylogenetic tree is here in generated using the sequences derived from 46 type, epitype cultures, and vouchers and is presented as a rough and quick identification guide for species of Phomopsis. The need for epitypification of taxonomic entities and the need to use multiple loci in phylogenies that better reflect species limits are suggested. The account of names of phytopathogens currently in use are listed alphabetically and annotated with a taxonomic entry, teleomorph, associated hosts and disease symptoms, including brief summaries of taxonomic and phylogenetic research. Available type culture information and details of gene sequences derived from type cultures are also summarized and tabulated.

show abstract

“…Host range: Reported as Phomopsis longicolla or Diaporthe sojae on Abutilon theophrasti (Li et al 2001;Vrande ci c et al 2004), Acer truncatum (Sun et al 2011), Ambrosia trifida, Euphorbia maculata, Rumex crispus, and Xanthium strumarium , Arachis hypogaea (Sanogo & Etarock 2009), Aster exilis, Caperonia palustris, Desmanthus illinoensis, Eclipta prostrata, Euphorbia nutans, Ipomoea lacunose, Polygonum aviculare, and Sida spinosa (Mengistu & Reddy 2005), Solanum melongena (Shu et al 2014), Chamaesyce nutans (Mengistu et al 2007), Cucumis melo, Glycine max (Hobbs et al 1985;Zhang et al 1997;Santos et al 2011;Gomes et al 2013), Vigna unguiculata (Roy & Rathnayake 1997) and Trichilia elegans (Flores et al 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%