1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.1999.00331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ostrinia nubilalis (Hb.) (Lep., Pyralidae) on sweet corn: relationship between adults caught in multibaited traps and ear damages

Abstract: Infestation with Ostrinia nubilalis "Hb[#\ the European corn borer "ECB# can be detected by using di}erent sampling techniques in the _eld and statistical models aimed to assess the development time of ECB larvae and crop damage[ An appropriate monitoring for this polyphagous species to show a relationship between the kind of sampling or a model and the subsequent damage in a particular crop\ is very di.cult[ Sex pheromone traps\ generally\ are also not reliable for monitoring ECB[ The possibility of employing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of correlation between male captures in pheromone traps and damage levels in the crop to be protected has also been reported in other studies (Maini and Burgio 1999;Hillier et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A lack of correlation between male captures in pheromone traps and damage levels in the crop to be protected has also been reported in other studies (Maini and Burgio 1999;Hillier et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Indeed, only one spraying date is applicable on maize, and many factors interfere with the precise timing of the application. Such interfering factors are: low availability of self‐propelled sprayers with an adjustable working height allowing treatments above the crop stand; rain or irrigation, which impede sprayer access to the field, in many cases just after maize flowering; the coexistence of different ECB biotypes with different voltinism, which impedes the accurate detection of the threshold; monitoring difficulties: counting egg masses is time consuming and pheromone traps, in spite of many positive experiences,52, 53 did not show good efficacy in the situation considered (data not shown). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite considerable variability in the numbers of moths caught with pheromones at different sites throughout the years, the percentage of plants with damage and the intensity of the infestation in terms of larval density and galleries found on the untreated plots did not differ substantially over the years or among the sites. This shows that it is not possible to foretell the intensity of the attack by the catch on a pheromone trap, or to predict the intensity of the crop infestation, as stated by Maini and Burgio (1999). Bartels and Hutchison (1995) suggest using blacklight traps to monitor ECB flight.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Pheromone Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%