2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62048-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I/O Post- and Co-Processing for High-Order Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that quadratic geometry is often sufficient for large deformation with quadratic and cubic solution spaces, and thus these methods can be used with existing meshing and visualization tools, though tailoring to p-version finite element efficiency [57] is beneficial. When cubic and higher order meshes are needed, one can use Gmsh [42] to generate arbitrary order meshes, but many popular mesh formats support at most second order elements and there is a need for improving data representation standards and postprocessing/visualization tools to better support high order geometry and solution fields [58]- [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that quadratic geometry is often sufficient for large deformation with quadratic and cubic solution spaces, and thus these methods can be used with existing meshing and visualization tools, though tailoring to p-version finite element efficiency [57] is beneficial. When cubic and higher order meshes are needed, one can use Gmsh [42] to generate arbitrary order meshes, but many popular mesh formats support at most second order elements and there is a need for improving data representation standards and postprocessing/visualization tools to better support high order geometry and solution fields [58]- [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%