2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30709-7_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I/O Optimizations Based on Workload Characteristics for Parallel File Systems

Abstract: Parallel file systems usually provide a unified storage solution, which fails to meet specific application needs. In this paper, we propose an extended file handle scheme to address this problem. It allows the file systems to specify optimizations for individual file or directory based on workload characteristics. One case study shows that our proposed approach improves the aggregate throughput of large files and small files by up to 5% and 30%, respectively. To further improve the access performance of small … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, different prefetch requirements cannot be met. Regarding metadata access, existing prefetching policies can be improved in the following three aspects: 1) most non-frequency-mining-based prefetching approaches rely heavily on simple patterns (e.g., temporal locality, sequentiality, and loop references) and do not fully exploit semantic correlations between files [10]; 2) considerable frequency-mining-based prefetching work cannot easily capture file associations imposed by users, particularly when the historical access information is not sufficient to learn associations [11]; and 3) choosing a reasonable prefetch-ing policy in concurrent workload scenarios is not straightforward, as the data of different applications are simultaneously handled by different processes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, different prefetch requirements cannot be met. Regarding metadata access, existing prefetching policies can be improved in the following three aspects: 1) most non-frequency-mining-based prefetching approaches rely heavily on simple patterns (e.g., temporal locality, sequentiality, and loop references) and do not fully exploit semantic correlations between files [10]; 2) considerable frequency-mining-based prefetching work cannot easily capture file associations imposed by users, particularly when the historical access information is not sufficient to learn associations [11]; and 3) choosing a reasonable prefetch-ing policy in concurrent workload scenarios is not straightforward, as the data of different applications are simultaneously handled by different processes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%