Prokaryotic genomes acquire and eliminate blocks of DNA sequence by lateral gene transfer and spontaneous deletion, respectively. The basic parameters of spontaneous deletion, which are expected to influence the course of genome evolution, have not been determined for any hyperthermophilic archaeon. We therefore screened a number of independent pyrimidine auxotrophs of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius for deletions and sequenced those detected. Deletions accounted for only 0.4% of spontaneous pyrE mutations, corresponding to a frequency of about 10 ؊8 per cell. Nucleotide sequence analysis of five independent deletions showed no significant association of the endpoints with short direct repeats, despite the fact that several such repeats occur within the pyrE gene and that duplication mutations in pyrE reverted at high frequencies. Endpoints of the spontaneous deletions did not coincide with short inverted repeats or potential stem-loop structures. No consensus sequence common to all the deletions could be identified, although two deletions showed the potential of being stabilized by octanucleotide sequences elsewhere in pyrE, and another pair of deletions shared an octanucleotide at their 3 ends. The unusually low frequency and low sequence dependence of spontaneous deletions in the S. acidocaldarius pyrE gene compared to other genetic systems could not be explained in terms of possible constraints imposed by the 5-fluoroorotate selection.Sequence analysis of entire genomes has made it clear that despite the gradual accumulation of nucleotide substitutions, much of the divergence among prokaryotic species occurs through acquisition and loss of blocks of DNA sequences. Although bacterial genomes carry significant amounts of sequences originating in other lineages, related species exhibit similar genome sizes (21, 22), implying a general balance of losses against gains. Notable exceptions to this size constancy occur in species that have adopted a parasitic life strategy; the genomes of these species are either small or rapidly shrinking, reflecting the elimination of many genes whose functions have become superfluous (1,6,24). The mechanistic basis of genome reduction appears to be a short-term capacity to delete DNA that exceeds the capacity to acquire it through lateral gene transfer. This kinetic bias in favor of deletion implies that the maintenance of genome size seen in most bacterial lineages reflects selection for function of the vast majority of genes in the genome (24). It also explains the genome features observed in most free-living prokaryotes, including compactness (i.e., high open reading frame [ORF] density) and a dearth of fulllength but nonfunctional ORFs (1, 24).Data from genomes of hyperthermophilic archaea suggest a similar interplay among DNA acquisition, DNA loss, and selection for function. For example, Pyrococcus species can acquire large blocks of DNA by lateral transfer (9), yet they have also maintained relatively constant genome sizes during speciation (35). However, these and other archaea...