2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NPM1 mutation but not RUNX1 mutation or multilineage dysplasia defines a prognostic subgroup within de novo acute myeloid leukemia lacking recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in the revised 2016 WHO classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,[25][26][27] Target PRPF40b, SRSF2, SF3B1, CSF3R, BRAF, GATA2, and TP53. 12,[25][26][27] Target PRPF40b, SRSF2, SF3B1, CSF3R, BRAF, GATA2, and TP53.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,[25][26][27] Target PRPF40b, SRSF2, SF3B1, CSF3R, BRAF, GATA2, and TP53. 12,[25][26][27] Target PRPF40b, SRSF2, SF3B1, CSF3R, BRAF, GATA2, and TP53.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all patients meeting inclusion criteria, we reviewed and classified data from targeted sequencing studies performed on bone marrow aspirates (n = 77) or peripheral blood (n = 14) specimens at the time of diagnosis, as previously described. 12,[25][26][27] were selected based on pathogenic involvement in myeloid malignancies. Genes assessed in all platforms were NPM1, FLT3, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, SETBP1, BCORL, SH2B3, SETD2, CREBBP, WT1, PHF6, CEBPA, RUNX1, ETV6, STAG2, PDS5B, RAD21, KRAS, NRAS, KIT, CBL, RIT1, PTPN11, NF1, JAK2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, PRPF40b, SRSF2, SF3B1, CSF3R, BRAF, GATA2, and TP53.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencing Studies Performed At Diagnosis mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only red blood cell count was significantly lower in the patients in cluster-2 (4 × 10 9 /L) compared to cluster-1 (5 × 10 9 /L) (Table 1A). Additionally, frequencies of the recurrent genetic abnormalities according to WHO classification [17] and mutational profiles were similar between the two clusters (Table 1B). Only FLT3-ITD mutation frequency was higher in cluster-2 patients than cluster-1 although it was not significant.…”
Section: Comparison Of Patient Characteristics and Outcome Between Twmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, this rate might be influenced by the fact that our study included only AML cases without a history of a prior myeloid neoplasm and without MDS-associated cytogenetic abnormalities. 2 , 17 Interestingly, Thol et al . and The Cancer Genome Atlas research network found a strong association between NPM1 mutations and mutations in cohesin genes, 2 , 17 and in our study 6 (31%) of 19 cases with cohesin mutations also had NPM1 mutations, and the latter were also associated with frequent megakaryocytes with separated nuclear lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 17 Interestingly, Thol et al . and The Cancer Genome Atlas research network found a strong association between NPM1 mutations and mutations in cohesin genes, 2 , 17 and in our study 6 (31%) of 19 cases with cohesin mutations also had NPM1 mutations, and the latter were also associated with frequent megakaryocytes with separated nuclear lobes. RAS pathway mutations were frequently seen in our cohort, being present in 58% of the cases and, similar to cohesin pathway and NPM1 mutations, were associated with megakaryocytes with separated nuclear lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%