2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Murchison Widefield Array and XMM-Newton observations of the Galactic supernova remnant G5.9+3.1

Abstract: Aims. In this paper we discuss the radio continuum and X-ray properties of the so-far poorly studied Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) G5.9+3.1. Methods. We present the radio spectral energy distribution (SED) of the Galactic SNR G5.9+3.1 obtained with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). Combining these new observations with the surveys at other radio continuum frequencies, we discuss the integrated radio continuum spectrum of this particular remnant. We have also analyzed an archival XMM-Newton observation, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is detecting this latter category of SNRs to which the MWA is well-suited, with its superb diffuse source sensitivity. As expected (Bowman et al 2013), the Phase I MWA proved itself to be a powerful machine for the detection of new SNRs (Hurley-Walker et al 2019a;Maxted et al 2019;Onić et al 2019), including several that had been previously misclassified as HII regions (Hindson et al 2016). These reclassifications were possible, thanks to the low-frequency coverage and the high-spectral resolution of the MWA: the spectra of H II regions turn over and go into absorption at the lowest part of the MWA band, and are thus readily distinguished from SNRs, which display power law spectra.…”
Section: Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulaementioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is detecting this latter category of SNRs to which the MWA is well-suited, with its superb diffuse source sensitivity. As expected (Bowman et al 2013), the Phase I MWA proved itself to be a powerful machine for the detection of new SNRs (Hurley-Walker et al 2019a;Maxted et al 2019;Onić et al 2019), including several that had been previously misclassified as HII regions (Hindson et al 2016). These reclassifications were possible, thanks to the low-frequency coverage and the high-spectral resolution of the MWA: the spectra of H II regions turn over and go into absorption at the lowest part of the MWA band, and are thus readily distinguished from SNRs, which display power law spectra.…”
Section: Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulaementioning
confidence: 66%
“…The SNR G5.9+3.1 was listed in the catalog of new SNR candidates by Reich et al (1988). There were follow-up radio observations with the Murchison Widefield Array (Onić et al 2019), who published a spectral index of α = −0.42. The best to-date image is from this paper at 200 MHz and with a resolution of 2 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%