2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manta birostris , predator of the deep? Insight into the diet of the giant manta ray through stable isotope analysis

Abstract: The characterization of diet for the giant manta ray Manta birostris has been problematic given their large-scale movement patterns and the difficulty in obtaining stomach contents from this species. The large majority of existing information is based on observational data limited to feeding events at the sea surface during daylight. Recently discovered aggregation sites for the giant manta ray off mainland Ecuador are some of the most accessible to date and provide a unique opportunity for researchers to gath… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(120 reference statements)
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that R. typus make regular deep dives, including in excess of 1000 m where they may encounter temperatures as low as 4°C (Wilson et al 2006). Both R. typus and the planktivorous reef manta ray Mobula alfredi have been shown to perform reverse diurnal migrations, which may be linked to stochastic feeding on abundant mesopelagic zooplankton layers (Gleiss et al 2013, Tyminski et al 2015, Burgess et al 2016, Stewart et al 2016). In addition to thermoregulation, returning to surface waters post-dive would aid in more efficient assimilation of prey consumed at depth.…”
Section: Temperature-and Prey-dependent Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that R. typus make regular deep dives, including in excess of 1000 m where they may encounter temperatures as low as 4°C (Wilson et al 2006). Both R. typus and the planktivorous reef manta ray Mobula alfredi have been shown to perform reverse diurnal migrations, which may be linked to stochastic feeding on abundant mesopelagic zooplankton layers (Gleiss et al 2013, Tyminski et al 2015, Burgess et al 2016, Stewart et al 2016). In addition to thermoregulation, returning to surface waters post-dive would aid in more efficient assimilation of prey consumed at depth.…”
Section: Temperature-and Prey-dependent Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we suggest that M. birostris was preying on P. monodon. Even though the observed individual was seen with its cephalic fins closed at 16 m deep, suggesting a non-feeding behavior (Ari & Correia, 2008) and recent work has found that M. birostris mainly feeds on deep-water zooplankton (Burgess et al, 2016;, the possibility that this muninid crustacean could be a prey of Mobula spp. shall not be completely discarded as few studies have determined that zooplankton, shrimps, crabs and small fishes are key items on giant manta rays diet (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953;Couturier et al, 2012;Rohner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and has been attributed to mating displays, parturition, removing attached remoras, playing and communicating (Rayner, ; Medeiros et al ., ). Based on the observations here, sequential breaches by M. birostris above schools would disrupt and disorientate individuals thereby increasing the chances of predation, although it remains uncertain if teleosts are a dietary component (Burgess et al ., ). If teleosts are targeted by M. birostris , then the arrival of S. guianensis and competition for the same prey would represent amensalism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite its global distribution and status as the world's largest batoid, the ecology and biology of M. birostris remain poorly understood and are based on opportunistic observations (Luiz et al, 2009;Medeiros et al, 2015;Burgess et al, 2016). Their diet is thought to comprise predominantly zooplankton (Burgess et al, 2016); differences in the relative spatio-temporal abundances of which probably affect M. birostris distributions (Luiz et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation