Abstract:Background: More than 15 years ago, the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) identified men's involvement with reproductive and contraceptive tasks as vital for improving women's reproductive health worldwide. The uptake of vasectomy provides one measure of men's involvement in reproductive and contraceptive actions, but uptake requires the negotiation of a complex set of social and psychological meanings related to masculinity, sexuality and contraceptive involvement. The limited rese… Show more
“…This bears some difference from earlier, often US-based work (e.g., Miller et al, 1991a;Mumford, 1983), which tended to emphasise the struggles, diffi culties and potential for regret about the operation among vasectomised men (see Terry & Braun, 2011a for more discussion on the ' negative tone ' of earlier research on vasectomy). It may be that contemporary cultural conditions (such as women ' s increasing role in the workplace, men ' s increasing exposure to health campaigns, and men ' s increasing involvement in child rearing) support the inevitability of the vasectomy for New Zealand men in the age group interviewed for this study, and this seems to be borne up by the statistics of high uptake from Sneyd et al (2001) research.…”
Section: Resolvingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This paper analyses qualitative data from single oneto-one interviews with men who had had a vasectomy, and is part of a larger study on men describing their vasectomies in the Aotearoa/New Zealand context (Terry & Braun, 2011aTerry & Braun, 2013). Sixteen participants had undergone a ' typical ' vasectomy (i.e., were partnered and had children), 12 participants had undergone a ' pre-emptive ' vasectomy (i.e., identifying themselves as childfree and wishing to make this permanent) and 6 participants were in the process of deciding whether to have a vasectomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vasectomy was therefore constructed as evidence of a milestone fulfi lment, the end of child bearing, as much as it was a contraceptive choice. This sense of being carried along by the life course does not mean the vasectomy was not signifi cant for the men, they more often than not constructed it as a ' big deal ' , and Michael himself referred to it in terms of being a ' sacrifi ce ' (Terry & Braun, 2011a). Although the operation itself was often referred to in terminology similar to Chad ' s ( " it ' s just such a pathetic little operation " ), its signifi cance to their partners and to themselves was infl ected with meaning.…”
Research that investigates and theorises the male reproductive life course is extremely limited, and often reduced to examining problems, such as infertility. As a consequence, what we know about men's reproductive decision making is often extrapolated from theorisation of the female reproductive life course, or simplistic assumptions about masculine identity. This article analyses interview data from 34 men talking about their vasectomy decision-making processes in order to provide a lens through which to understand men making sense of their reproductive life course. Men who had children spoke of their vasectomy as resolving their lay understandings of the 'normal' life course, men who did not want their children to speak of resisting the normal life course, and men who had experienced or considered relationship dissolution spoke of resetting the life course.
“…This bears some difference from earlier, often US-based work (e.g., Miller et al, 1991a;Mumford, 1983), which tended to emphasise the struggles, diffi culties and potential for regret about the operation among vasectomised men (see Terry & Braun, 2011a for more discussion on the ' negative tone ' of earlier research on vasectomy). It may be that contemporary cultural conditions (such as women ' s increasing role in the workplace, men ' s increasing exposure to health campaigns, and men ' s increasing involvement in child rearing) support the inevitability of the vasectomy for New Zealand men in the age group interviewed for this study, and this seems to be borne up by the statistics of high uptake from Sneyd et al (2001) research.…”
Section: Resolvingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This paper analyses qualitative data from single oneto-one interviews with men who had had a vasectomy, and is part of a larger study on men describing their vasectomies in the Aotearoa/New Zealand context (Terry & Braun, 2011aTerry & Braun, 2013). Sixteen participants had undergone a ' typical ' vasectomy (i.e., were partnered and had children), 12 participants had undergone a ' pre-emptive ' vasectomy (i.e., identifying themselves as childfree and wishing to make this permanent) and 6 participants were in the process of deciding whether to have a vasectomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vasectomy was therefore constructed as evidence of a milestone fulfi lment, the end of child bearing, as much as it was a contraceptive choice. This sense of being carried along by the life course does not mean the vasectomy was not signifi cant for the men, they more often than not constructed it as a ' big deal ' , and Michael himself referred to it in terms of being a ' sacrifi ce ' (Terry & Braun, 2011a). Although the operation itself was often referred to in terminology similar to Chad ' s ( " it ' s just such a pathetic little operation " ), its signifi cance to their partners and to themselves was infl ected with meaning.…”
Research that investigates and theorises the male reproductive life course is extremely limited, and often reduced to examining problems, such as infertility. As a consequence, what we know about men's reproductive decision making is often extrapolated from theorisation of the female reproductive life course, or simplistic assumptions about masculine identity. This article analyses interview data from 34 men talking about their vasectomy decision-making processes in order to provide a lens through which to understand men making sense of their reproductive life course. Men who had children spoke of their vasectomy as resolving their lay understandings of the 'normal' life course, men who did not want their children to speak of resisting the normal life course, and men who had experienced or considered relationship dissolution spoke of resetting the life course.
“…“Vasectomy is not an end in itself but a beginning of taking responsibility for the family’s welfare” [ 1 ]. The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Egypt identified male involvement in contraception as vital to women’s health [ 2 ]. Advocacy for male involvement in the use of family planning methods has been promoted over the years [ 3 ].…”
BackgroundAdvocacy for male involvement in family planning has been championed over the years after the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). There are a few contraceptive methods for men, and vasectomy uptake has been identified as one of the indicators of male involvement in family planning. Vasectomy also known as male sterilization is a permanent form of contraception. It is a generally safe, quick, easy, effective surgical operation with rare complications to prevent release of sperm. The study explored the vasectomy perspectives of urban Ghanaian women.MethodsA qualitative approach was used and five focus group discussions were held with women in urban Accra. The study was conducted in the five sub-metropolitan areas of the Accra Metropolitan Health Directorate from September–October 2013. Participants were adult and young adult women who are members of organized groups and unions. Data were analyzed manually after transcribing and coding and themes were sorted using thematic version 0.9.ResultsBoth adult and young adult participants regarded vasectomy as an easy way for male partners to become promiscuous and cheat on them (women) because the operation renders males incapable of having a child; promiscuity could lead to the women contracting sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS. They were also skeptical about vasectomy and the possibility that it could damage the sexual organs of their partners and affect their sexual relationships. The uptake of vasectomy will not benefit a new wife in case of divorce or death of a previous wife. Some women would allow their partners to undergo the procedure only if both of them will benefit health-wise and also if it would reduce the financial burden on the family.ConclusionThe women held mixed perceptions; both negative and positive views were shared on vasectomy uptake. The views were predominantly negative, and they regarded vasectomy as an unacceptable method of contraception. The women virtually had no reasons to encourage their partners to undergo a vasectomy. In order to increase vasectomy uptake in Ghana, innovative efforts to address the misconceptions and superstitions surrounding vasectomy should take centre stage; appropriate and targeted messaging during integrated health services delivery and social/health campaigns would be a good starting point.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0286-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…Mumford, 1983). Even in a country such as New Zealand, which arguably has the highest rates of vasectomy worldwide (Pile & Barone, 2009;Sneyd, Cox, Paul, & Skegg, 2001;Terry & Braun, 2011a, 2011b, there is often a significant period of delay. This delay has been accounted for in various ways, but one explanation is that vasectomy exists within a 'contraceptive economy' where women are considered primarily responsible for the contraceptive burden (Oudshoorn, 2003(Oudshoorn, , 2004Terry & Braun, 2011b).…”
Objective: The relatively recent interest in critical men's health research has largely focused upon men's experiences of managing or preventing ill health. There has been limited discussion on the decision making that men engage in with health practices that are not constructed as immediately imperative for their own well-being -such as vasectomy. Much of the research on vasectomy has tended to focus on the individualised decision making men, which can often decontextualize the process. This article seeks to address some of these absences.Design: This article reports on data from semi-structured interviews with twenty eight men who had had vasectomies (16 with children, 12 without). Data were analysed using Wetherell and Edley's synthetic approach to discourse analysis.Results: Talking about vasectomy provided an opportunity for men to make sense of the self and the decision making processes within a complex and relational understanding of masculinities.Rather than an individualised decision making process, many of the men's accounts were reliant on stories of other men who the participants could be compared against.Conclusions: Men made sense of an 'optional' health decision in relation to other men (both real and imagined), in order to help justify delays, or other 'trouble' in the decision making processes. Men's health initiatives and research may need to take this relational component of health decision-making into account.2
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.