1981
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80175-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

lac‐Repressor headpiece constitutes a reversibly unfolding domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in Kq at higher temperature could also be due to thermal denaturation of the headpiece. Thus, the Tm of 2: 40 °C (Hinz et al, 1981; Schnarr & Maurizot, 1982) for the headpiece is close enough to the temperature ( > 25 °C) at which Kd increases with temperature. That both native repressor and headpiece both show a similar nonlinear dependence of the dissociation constant with temperature rules out the trivial explanation that the effect for the whole repressor is possibly attributable to the dissociation of individual subunits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The decrease in Kq at higher temperature could also be due to thermal denaturation of the headpiece. Thus, the Tm of 2: 40 °C (Hinz et al, 1981; Schnarr & Maurizot, 1982) for the headpiece is close enough to the temperature ( > 25 °C) at which Kd increases with temperature. That both native repressor and headpiece both show a similar nonlinear dependence of the dissociation constant with temperature rules out the trivial explanation that the effect for the whole repressor is possibly attributable to the dissociation of individual subunits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The large influence of the coenzyme PLP on the thermodynamic parameters of subunit association has been demonstrated in a previous study (Wiesinger et al, 1979). It has been found that proton flux, reaction enthalpies, and heat capacity changes, which are indicative of structural changes of the macromolecule (Sturtevant, 1977;Hinz et al, 1981;Hinz, 1983), are very different for apoenzyme and holoenzyme formation from the isolated a and ß2 and a and (jd-PLP)2 subunits, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our analysis of the purine repressor structure indicates that formation of the antiparallel hinge helices buries $2000 A Ê 2 of non-polar surface and $1600 A Ê 2 polar surface, comparable to that removed in the interface, contributing $ À 500 cal mol À1 K À1 to the overall ÁC of HP folding is À300 cal mol À1 K À1 (Hinz et al, 1981), and the ellipticity of the unbound HP corresponds to $30% alpha-helix, half of that observed in the half-site complex (Chuprina et al, 1993 , and that a total of $70 residues fold. From the consistency between this calculation and the experimentally determined value of ÁC o obs and the predicted number of residues which fold (90 AE 10, see Table 4), we propose that the surface area buried in folding transitions in the hinge helices and the HP dominates the ÁC (Takeda et al, 1992).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Heat Capacity Changes Of Protein-nucleic Amentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, [salt] is known to have profound effects on the stability of the HP (Wemmer et al, 1981;Schnarr & Maurizot, 1982); at neutral pH the denaturation temperature increases from 310 K at low [salt] ($10 mM) to 340 K at high [salt] (1 M), and isolation of intact HP from the core domain by limited proteolytic digestion is only possible at high [salt] (1 M Tris-HCl). Even at relatively high [salt] (50.4 M) and neutral pH, the HP structure appears to be``loose'' or``mobile'' when compared to other highly ordered proteins: its amide protons exchange rapidly (Wemmer et al, 1981), NMR resonance lines are sharp (WadeJardetsky et al, 1979), and its thermally induced unfolding transition is broad (Hinz et al, 1981;Schnarr & Maurizot, 1981, 1982Wemmer et al, 1981). Under these conditions, interactions which stabilize the HP appear only weakly cooperative, in contrast to the highly cooperative folding units of other proteins of comparable size (see for example Alexander et al, 1992).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Heat Capacity Changes Of Protein-nucleic Amentioning
confidence: 97%