2014
DOI: 10.1017/s001309151400008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lp-Spectral Multipliers for some Elliptic Systems

Abstract: We show results on L p -spectral multipliers for Maxwell operators with bounded measurable coefficients. We also present similar results for the Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions and the Lamé system. Here, we rely on resolvent estimates recently established by Mitrea and Monniaux.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If c ≥ 0, then p = (p * c ) ′ = 1 is included. It is also known (see [36]) that the estimates (GGE p ) hold for some p with 1 ≤ p < 2 (and hence the property (FS) also holds) when L is the second order Maxwell operator with measurable coefficient matrices, or the Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions on bounded Lipschitz domains in R 3 , or the time-dependent Lamé system equipped with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If c ≥ 0, then p = (p * c ) ′ = 1 is included. It is also known (see [36]) that the estimates (GGE p ) hold for some p with 1 ≤ p < 2 (and hence the property (FS) also holds) when L is the second order Maxwell operator with measurable coefficient matrices, or the Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions on bounded Lipschitz domains in R 3 , or the time-dependent Lamé system equipped with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we have S n u L p (D) 6 ≤ C u L p (D) 6 with a constant C > 0 depending on p, but not on u and n. Note that such an estimate is not available for P n in a general situation. This remarkable uniform L p -boundedness is a consequence of [21], together with generalized Gaussian bounds for the Hodge-Laplacian (see [25], [22]). The deep connection between ∆ H and M is a consequence of the formula −∆ H = curl curl − grad div, which implies ∆ H = M 2 in the range of the Helmholtz projection P H and M 2 = 0 in the range of (I −P H ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the following Lemma, we exploit the fact Proof. The first claim can be found in [25], section 3 or in [22], Lemma 5.4. Consequently, we also have S n P H = P H S n and P n P H = P H P n , since S n and P n are in the functional calculus of ∆ H .…”
Section: The Hodge-laplacian On a Bounded C 1 -Domain And Its Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well-known that p 0 is sharp in the sense that for any r / ∈ [p 0 , p ′ 0 ] there exists an operator L in the given class for which e −tL cannot be extended from [23,Theorem 10]). In another paper ( [41]) we discuss how spectral multiplier theorems of the type presented here apply to the second order Maxwell operator with measurable coefficient matrices and the Stokes operator with Hodge boundary conditions on bounded Lipschitz domains in R 3 as well as the time-dependent Lamé system equipped with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions.…”
Section: If a Bounded Borel Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%