2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788710000091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L(n)-HYPONORMALITY: A MISSING BRIDGE BETWEEN SUBNORMALITY AND PARANORMALITY

Abstract: A new notion of L(n)-hyponormality is introduced in order to provide a bridge between subnormality and paranormality, two concepts which have received considerable attention from operator theorists since the 1950s. Criteria for L(n)-hyponormality are given. Relationships to other notions of hyponormality are discussed in the context of weighted shift and composition operators.2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 47B20; secondary 47B33, 47B37.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by these previous results and the criterion for subnormality of general unbounded operators due to Stochel and Szafraniec (see [27,Theorem 3]), we introduce in this paper classes S * n,r of unbounded operators closely related to cosubnormal operators (they resemble, in a sense, weak hyponormality classes studied in the case of bounded operators, cf. [22,20,15,19]) and investigate under what conditions composition operators with infinite matrix symbols belong to the classes. We use inductive limits to achieve our goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by these previous results and the criterion for subnormality of general unbounded operators due to Stochel and Szafraniec (see [27,Theorem 3]), we introduce in this paper classes S * n,r of unbounded operators closely related to cosubnormal operators (they resemble, in a sense, weak hyponormality classes studied in the case of bounded operators, cf. [22,20,15,19]) and investigate under what conditions composition operators with infinite matrix symbols belong to the classes. We use inductive limits to achieve our goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%