2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07654.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-Ddependence for supernova remnants and its connection with the Σ-Drelation

Abstract: We discuss the L–D correlation (possible dependence of radio luminosity on linear diameter) for supernova remnants (SNRs) in order to see whether the Σ–D relation actually exists and whether determination of SNR distances on the basis of the Σ–D relation is possible. We do not find any significant correlation, except for the M82 starburst galaxy for which a good Σ–D relation does exist. Finally, we suggest that a similar relation might exist for Galactic SNRs associated with large molecular clouds, indicating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured slope for the M 82 SNRs is β = 3.4 ± 0.2, while that of the remaining SNRs in the master relation is β = 1.9 ± 0.15. The latter slope does not have a physical origin, but is consistent with the luminosity-diameter scattering artifact (see Arbutina et al 2004). According to theory, the surface brightness of the SNR is a function of the density of the gas of the medium the SNR is interacting with.…”
Section: Evolutionary Tracks In the σ − D Planementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The measured slope for the M 82 SNRs is β = 3.4 ± 0.2, while that of the remaining SNRs in the master relation is β = 1.9 ± 0.15. The latter slope does not have a physical origin, but is consistent with the luminosity-diameter scattering artifact (see Arbutina et al 2004). According to theory, the surface brightness of the SNR is a function of the density of the gas of the medium the SNR is interacting with.…”
Section: Evolutionary Tracks In the σ − D Planementioning
confidence: 52%
“…so-called trivial Σ − D relation with β = 2 (Arbutina et al 2004). This can be understood mathematically from:…”
Section: The Empirical σ−D Relation For Pnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it still might be possible to construct the relations for some classes of SNRs. In our previous paper (Arbutina et al 2004, hereafter Paper I), we analysed the Σ– D relation(s) for remnants in a dense environment of molecular clouds. In this paper, we try to obtain a relation for SNRs evolving in interstellar media (ISMs) of lower density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%