2011
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KEPLER MISSION STELLAR AND INSTRUMENT NOISE PROPERTIES

Abstract: An earlier study of the Kepler Mission noise properties on time scales of primary relevance to detection of exoplanet transits found that higher than expected noise followed to a large extent from the stars, rather than instrument or data analysis performance. The earlier study over the first six quarters of Kepler data is extended to the full four years ultimately comprising the mission. Efforts to improve the pipeline data analysis have been successful in reducing noise levels modestly as evidenced by smalle… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
221
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
16
221
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our derived values are similar to the ones reported in the KIC, but here we can determine their uncertainties. The derived jitter is around 100 ppm for KOI-200, which is compatible with the typical value derived by Gilliland et al (2011) for the Kepler data ). In the case of KOI-889 we found ∼300 ppm; the excess of jitter could be explained by the activity of the star.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our derived values are similar to the ones reported in the KIC, but here we can determine their uncertainties. The derived jitter is around 100 ppm for KOI-200, which is compatible with the typical value derived by Gilliland et al (2011) for the Kepler data ). In the case of KOI-889 we found ∼300 ppm; the excess of jitter could be explained by the activity of the star.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Photometric accuracy is related to the position of a stellar image on this array, but for a mean flux count of about 186000 per minute for a mag 12.0 star (cf. Table 2, below) a measuring standard deviation equivalent to about 383 ppm was estimated by the Kepler Mission engineers (Gilliland et al, 2011). This is close to our finding from the best fitting models pursued in this paper, although certain examples appear to show a wider deviation, for reasons we consider later.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There are anomalies in some instances, however. The ∆l K values take some account of variation in intrinsic scatter in the source counts at a given mean brightness (Gilliland et al 2011), but if this is higher than normal in a particular case, an additional intrinsic variability, perhaps of a pulsational type, could be the explanation. This seems feasible for KOI 10.01, where there is an unexpectedly high χ 2 /ν ratio, as well as a significant excess of ∆l K /∆l p .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photometric residuals show an rms of 177 ppm, consistent with the median error of the data points (185 ppm). The rms over 3 h is 72 ppm, in agreement with the combined differential photometric precision of ∼85 ppm (Gilliland et al, 2011) provided by the Kepler team.…”
Section: L6 Page 2 Ofsupporting
confidence: 81%