2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ks- andLp-band polarimetry on stellar and bow-shock sources in the Galactic center

Abstract: Context. Infrared observations of the Galactic center (GC) provide a unique opportunity to study stellar and bow-shock polarization effects in a dusty environment. Aims. The goals of this work are to present new Ks-and Lp-band polarimetry on an unprecedented number of sources in the central parsec of the GC, thereby expanding our previous results in the H-and Ks-bands. Methods. We use AO-assisted Ks-and Lp-band observations, obtained at the ESO VLT. High precision photometry and the new polarimetric calibratio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also matches the results of Buchholz et al (2011) well in terms of polarization magnitude, but this is not a strong constraint, as dust inside the shock decreases the outgoing polarization ( § 4.3). However, our simulated position angles produce a centrosymmetric pattern even in cases of dust emission, whereas Buchholz et al (2011Buchholz et al ( , 2013 found a consistent polarization orientation of Φ ∼ −75 • across the bow shock (parallel to the bow head, in contrast with the results of Rauch et al 2013). Thus, while the spherical dust grains we consider could produce the behaviour of the polarization magnitudes observed in IRS 1W, the position angle behaviour suggests elongated grains are more likely, as discussed in Buchholz et al (2011).…”
Section: Resolved Bow Shockmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…It also matches the results of Buchholz et al (2011) well in terms of polarization magnitude, but this is not a strong constraint, as dust inside the shock decreases the outgoing polarization ( § 4.3). However, our simulated position angles produce a centrosymmetric pattern even in cases of dust emission, whereas Buchholz et al (2011Buchholz et al ( , 2013 found a consistent polarization orientation of Φ ∼ −75 • across the bow shock (parallel to the bow head, in contrast with the results of Rauch et al 2013). Thus, while the spherical dust grains we consider could produce the behaviour of the polarization magnitudes observed in IRS 1W, the position angle behaviour suggests elongated grains are more likely, as discussed in Buchholz et al (2011).…”
Section: Resolved Bow Shockmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The alignment mechanism implies a compression of the magnetic field of the Northern Arm in the environs of the bow shocks and the increment of the local field density. These changes produce a rapid magnetic alignment of the grains (Buchholz et al 2013). From the best-fit bow-shock stand-off distances, we have established that their central sources are massive objects (WR stars) with supersonic stellar wind velocities and strong mass-loss rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Polarization and emission mechanisms Buchholz et al (2013) described that the bow-shock sources, particularly IRS 21 and IRS 1W, exhibit strong polarization (2) and (3)). The blue axis is centered on the position of the star and the scale is in multiples of R 0 .…”
Section: Bow-shock Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested and calibrated the linear polarization measurement with GRAVITY on sources with known polarization properties (taken from Ott et al 1999;Buchholz et al 2013), namely GCIRS21 (P ≈ 14%; θ ≈ 15 • ), IRS16SW (P ≈ 3.1%; θ ≈ 20 • ), GCIRS33E (P ≈ 5.7%; θ ≈ 35 • ) and IRS1W (P ≈ 1.8%; θ ≈ −37 • ). Here the polarization angle is defined in the range [−90 • , 90 • ] with the angle increasing east of north.…”
Section: A4 Linear Polarization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%